From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752762AbVHGX7f (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:59:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752853AbVHGX7f (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:59:35 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:43480 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752762AbVHGX7e (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:59:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:59:32 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c Message-ID: <20050807235932.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <372830000.1123456808@[10.10.2.4]> <20050807234411.GE7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <374910000.1123459025@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <374910000.1123459025@[10.10.2.4]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@mbligh.org) wrote: > You're welcome to suggest something else if you want, though it would > have been easier if you'd done it the first time you saw this patch, > not now. Going through this stuff multiple times is going to get very > boring very fast. Sorry, that's my fault, didn't strike me until looking at it this time. thanks, -chris