From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
torvalds@osdl.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@redhat.com
Subject: Re: pci_update_resource() getting called on sparc64
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:38:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050808213842.GA9010@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050808194249.GA6729@kroah.com>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:42:49PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:32:09PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > And lo' and behold, we find the answer in the PCI probing code.
> > It initializes every PCI device's PCI power state to "unknown":
> >
> > /* "Unknown power state" */
> > dev->current_state = 4;
> >
> > and thus makes this test ">= D3hot" pass in the pci_set_power_state()
> > code.
>
> Crap, gotta love >= checks on enumerated types...
The "dev->current_state = 4" is what prompted the ">= D3hot" in the
first place... :-)
I had seen a patch from earlier this year that changed the probing
code to actually get the power state from the device (and added a
pci_get_power_state API). I don't know why that never got merged,
but since it didn't I had to account for the case of the power state
being unknown (i.e dev->current_state == 4).
So, w/ Dave's patch for Sparc64 to use setup-res.c, does the patch
stay? Is there anything else I need to do?
Thanks,
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-08 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-08 14:12 pci_update_resource() getting called on sparc64 David S. Miller
2005-08-08 14:44 ` Greg KH
2005-08-08 17:33 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-08 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-08 16:08 ` Greg KH
2005-08-08 19:32 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-08 19:42 ` Greg KH
2005-08-08 19:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-08 20:02 ` Greg KH
2005-08-08 20:19 ` [PCI PATCH]: Make sparc64 use setup-res.c David S. Miller
2005-08-08 19:56 ` pci_update_resource() getting called on sparc64 Linus Torvalds
2005-08-08 21:38 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2005-08-08 21:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-08 21:59 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-09 9:54 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050808213842.GA9010@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox