From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932282AbVHHWAI (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:00:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932283AbVHHWAI (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:00:08 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([24.172.12.4]:23312 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932282AbVHHWAH (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2005 18:00:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:59:21 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: "David S. Miller" Cc: greg@kroah.com, torvalds@osdl.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@redhat.com Subject: Re: pci_update_resource() getting called on sparc64 Message-ID: <20050808215920.GA9387@tuxdriver.com> Mail-Followup-To: "David S. Miller" , greg@kroah.com, torvalds@osdl.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@redhat.com References: <20050808.123209.59463259.davem@davemloft.net> <20050808194249.GA6729@kroah.com> <20050808213842.GA9010@tuxdriver.com> <20050808.144347.78712074.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050808.144347.78712074.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:43:47PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: "John W. Linville" > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:38:43 -0400 > > > So, w/ Dave's patch for Sparc64 to use setup-res.c, does the patch > > stay? Is there anything else I need to do? > > The plan is to revert your patch for 2.6.13, and then put it > back in with my (invasive at this point in the 2.6.13 development > cycle) sparc64 patch on top. Cool...thanks for clarifying! Let me know if I can be helpful... John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com