From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750811AbVHITIn@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750811AbVHITIn (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:08:43 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750812AbVHITIn
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:08:43 -0400
Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:12203
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750811AbVHITIm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:08:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20050809.120845.48831707.davem@davemloft.net>
To: tmdubui@tycho.ncsc.mil
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] pfkey implementation vs. RFC
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <0D2F5426C26FD511A1C400B0D0D0596801569238@deliverance.tycho.ncsc.mil>
References: <0D2F5426C26FD511A1C400B0D0D0596801569238@deliverance.tycho.ncsc.mil>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: "DuBuisson, Thomas" <tmdubui@tycho.ncsc.mil>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:22:15 -0400 

> I've posted this to linux-net and netdev but have had no response.

It is possible that people who are qualified in this area are just too
busy to reply to you, or simply disinterested for one reason or
another.