From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964957AbVHIUwU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:52:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964958AbVHIUwU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:52:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:12178 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964957AbVHIUwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:52:19 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 0/2] mm: remove PageReserved Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:52:38 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-kernel , Linux Memory Management , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Benjamin Herrenschmidt References: <42F57FCA.9040805@yahoo.com.au> <200508100514.13672.phillips@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508100652.39241.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 10 August 2005 06:17, Hugh Dickins wrote: > There might be a case for packaging repeated arguments into structures > (though several of these levels are inlined anyway), but that's some > other exercise entirely, shouldn't get in the way of removing Reserved. Agreed, an entirely separate question that I'd like to return to in time. The existing herd of page table walkers is unnecessarily repetitious. Regards, Daniel