From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965053AbVHJKBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:01:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932558AbVHJKBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:01:54 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:30339 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932555AbVHJKBy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:01:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:01:33 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Todd Poynor Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: PowerOP 2/3: Intel Centrino support Message-ID: <20050810100133.GA1945@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050809025419.GC25064@slurryseal.ddns.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050809025419.GC25064@slurryseal.ddns.mvista.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Minimal PowerOP support for Intel Enhanced Speedstep "Centrino" > notebooks. These systems run at an operating point comprised of a cpu > frequency and a core voltage. The voltage could be set from the values > recommended in the datasheets if left unspecified (-1) in the operating > point, as cpufreq does. Eh? I thought these are handled okay by cpufreq already? What is advantage of this over cpufreq? Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address