From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965219AbVHJRIp (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:08:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965216AbVHJRIp (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:08:45 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:64402 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965212AbVHJRIo (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:08:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:08:37 -0700 From: Richard Henderson To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate sys_ptrace Message-ID: <20050810170837.GA25403@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <20050810080057.GA5295@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050810080057.GA5295@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude > them: alpha... Alpha could be updated to use this, I think. Just a matter of using force_successful_syscall_return instead of pt_regs directly. I'll have a look at testing this. r~