From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si>
Cc: LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:06:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050810230633.0cb8737b.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42FA6406.4030901@cetrtapot.si>
Hi Hinko,
> > In order to verify whether I2C block reads work for you, just
> > compare the contents of this file:
> > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0050/eeprom
>
> I've tested your patch on gericom X5 with VIA chipset and it works
> fine without/with your patch (no diff in eeprom contents).
> (...)
> 0000:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge
This is a surprising result, as the VT8233 datasheet didn't mention the
I2C block mode. I'll add this model to the list. This also suggests that
the VT8233A may support it as well - if someone could test that.
I have to admit I don't know exactly in which order the different south
bridges were designed and released by VIA. I think the following order
is correct:
VT82C596
VT82C596B
VT82C686A
VT82C686B
VT8235
VT8237
But I don't know where the VT8231, VT8233 and VT8233A should be inserted
in this list. If anyone can tell me...
Could you try running "i2cdump 0 0x50" and "i2cdump 0 0x50 i" (with the
patch still applied), and compare both the outputs and the time each
command takes? You should see similar outputs, but the second command
should be magnitudes faster. This would confirm that the I2C block mode
works as intended on your VT8233 chip.
(0 and 0x50 may be different values on your system, please adapt
depending on where in the sysfs tree the eeprom file appeared.)
Thanks for the tests.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-10 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-09 21:13 I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 20:31 ` Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-10 21:06 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2005-08-10 22:23 ` [lm-sensors] " Martin Drab
2005-08-11 17:12 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-10 23:13 ` Hinko Kocevar
2005-08-11 16:56 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 19:13 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 19:59 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 21:39 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-11 21:49 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-11 22:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12 6:26 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-12 15:29 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-08-12 17:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-08-12 1:07 ` [lm-sensors] " Mark M. Hoffman
2005-08-12 6:02 ` Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-10 1:55 Salah Coronya
2005-08-10 10:06 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050810230633.0cb8737b.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox