Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace

Paul Mundt
2005-11-02T11:21:49Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:12:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude
> > them. They continue to keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to
> > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the
> > first call. For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block,
> > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree.
>
> Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead
> of the old one. I really should write this text from scratch instead
> of copying it :)
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]