From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rusty@au1.ibm.com,
bmark@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:30:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050811180044.GD4546@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050811171451.GA5108@infradead.org>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:11:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This patch is an experiment in use of RCU for individual code paths that
> > read-acquire the tasklist lock, in this case, unicast signal delivery.
> > It passes five kernbenches on 4-CPU x86, but obviously needs much more
> > testing before it is considered for serious use, let alone inclusion.
>
> I think we should switch over tasklist_lock to RCU completely instead of
> adding suck hacks. I've started lots of preparation work to get rid of
> tasklist_lock users outside of kernel/, especialy getting rid of any
> use in modules.
That would be really helpful, specially the ones in drivers/char/tty*.c :)
When I worked on this last (a year or so ago), it seemed that I would
need to put a number of additional structures under RCU control.
It would be better to gradually move it towards RCU rather than
trying make all the readers lock-free.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-11 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-10 17:11 [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-11 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 2:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-12 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 17:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-11 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 18:00 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2005-08-11 18:12 ` Dipankar Sarma
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-11 12:16 Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-11 15:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 1:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 8:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-12 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-16 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 11:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-16 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 1:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-17 14:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-17 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-19 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050811180044.GD4546@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=bmark@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox