From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:56:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050812015607.GR1300@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42FB41B5.98314BA5@tv-sign.ru>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:16:53PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.13-rc6/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-08 19:59:24.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-tasklistRCU/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-10 08:20:25.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -1151,9 +1151,13 @@ int group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct
> >
> > ret = check_kill_permission(sig, info, p);
> > if (!ret && sig && p->sighand) {
> > + if (!get_task_struct_rcu(p)) {
> > + return -ESRCH;
> > + }
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
> ^^^^^^^
> Is it correct?
Most definitely not! Thank you again for catching this one, would have
taken some serious test-and-debug time to root it out the hard way.
Fix provided as a patch against V0.7.53-01, probably still has some
bugs, as it has not yet been thoroughly tested. General approach is
to RCU-protect the sighand pointer from task_struct to sighand_struct.
Will be testing more thoroughly, in the meantime, thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
fs/exec.c | 6 +++++-
include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/fork.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/signal.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/fs/exec.c linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/fs/exec.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/fs/exec.c 2005-08-11 11:44:55.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/fs/exec.c 2005-08-11 12:26:45.000000000 -0700
@@ -773,6 +773,8 @@ no_thread_group:
*/
spin_lock_init(&newsighand->siglock);
atomic_set(&newsighand->count, 1);
+ newsighand->deleted = 0;
+ newsighand->successor = NULL;
memcpy(newsighand->action, oldsighand->action,
sizeof(newsighand->action));
@@ -785,12 +787,14 @@ no_thread_group:
recalc_sigpending();
task_unlock(current);
+ oldsighand->deleted = 1;
+ oldsighand->successor = newsighand;
spin_unlock(&newsighand->siglock);
spin_unlock(&oldsighand->siglock);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&oldsighand->count))
- kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, oldsighand);
+ sighand_free(oldsighand);
}
BUG_ON(!thread_group_empty(current));
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/include/linux/sched.h linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/include/linux/sched.h 2005-08-11 11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/include/linux/sched.h 2005-08-11 12:17:01.000000000 -0700
@@ -450,8 +450,18 @@ struct sighand_struct {
atomic_t count;
struct k_sigaction action[_NSIG];
spinlock_t siglock;
+ int deleted;
+ struct sighand_struct *successor;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
};
+static inline void sighand_free(struct sighand_struct *sp)
+{
+ extern void sighand_free_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp);
+
+ call_rcu(&sp->rcu, sighand_free_cb);
+}
+
/*
* NOTE! "signal_struct" does not have it's own
* locking, because a shared signal_struct always
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/fork.c linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/fork.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/fork.c 2005-08-11 11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/fork.c 2005-08-11 13:05:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
#include <linux/acct.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -769,6 +770,14 @@ int unshare_files(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unshare_files);
+void sighand_free_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+ struct sighand_struct *sp =
+ container_of(rhp, struct sighand_struct, rcu);
+
+ kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, sp);
+}
+
static inline int copy_sighand(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct * tsk)
{
struct sighand_struct *sig;
@@ -783,6 +792,8 @@ static inline int copy_sighand(unsigned
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_init(&sig->siglock);
atomic_set(&sig->count, 1);
+ sig->deleted = 0;
+ sig->successor = 0;
memcpy(sig->action, current->sighand->action, sizeof(sig->action));
return 0;
}
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/signal.c linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-11 11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/signal.c 2005-08-11 17:37:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -1150,16 +1150,26 @@ void zap_other_threads(struct task_struc
int group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ struct sighand_struct *sp;
int ret;
ret = check_kill_permission(sig, info, p);
- if (!ret && sig && p->sighand) {
+ if (!ret && sig && (sp = p->sighand)) {
if (!get_task_struct_rcu(p)) {
return -ESRCH;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sp->siglock, flags);
+ while (sp->deleted) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->siglock, flags);
+ sp = sp->successor;
+ if (sp == NULL) {
+ put_task_struct(p);
+ return -ESRCH;
+ }
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sp->siglock, flags);
+ }
ret = __group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->siglock, flags);
put_task_struct(p);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 12:16 [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-11 15:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 1:56 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2005-08-12 8:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-12 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-16 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 11:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-16 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 1:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-17 14:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-17 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-19 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-10 17:11 Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-11 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 2:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-12 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 17:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-11 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 18:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-08-11 18:12 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050812015607.GR1300@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox