* 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
@ 2005-08-11 15:59 Phil Dier
2005-08-12 2:07 ` Neil Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Phil Dier @ 2005-08-11 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: ziggy, Scott Holdren, Jack Massari
Hi,
I posted an oops a few days ago from 2.6.12.3 [1]. Here are the results
of my tests on 2.6.13-rc6. The kernel oopses, but it the box isn't completely
hosed; I can still log in and move around. It appears that the only things that are
locked are the apps that were doing i/o to the test partition. More detailed info
about my configuration can be found here:
<http://www.icglink.com/debug-2.6.13-rc6.html>
Here is the oops:
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c0116dd0>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010207 (2.6.13-rc6)
EIP is at kmap+0x10/0x30
eax: 00000003 ebx: d0977440 ecx: c9efb470 edx: 00000000
esi: c1000000 edi: 00000000 ebp: ce59d570 esp: f7adde18
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process md4_raid1 (pid: 6442, threadinfo=f7adc000 task=f70eda20)
Stack: c014e0bd c9efb470 00000001 00000000 00000000 cb129000 00000001 e0c65f00
f7dcbe18 087641ef 00000000 f7dcbe18 c014e146 f7dcbe18 f7addeb0 c3146940
c033f03f f7dcbe18 f7addeb0 0021d906 00000000 0000003f 00000040 00000000
Call Trace:
[<c014e0bd>] __blk_queue_bounce+0x20d/0x260
[<c014e146>] blk_queue_bounce+0x36/0x60
[<c033f03f>] __make_request+0x5f/0x560
[<c0132b90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
[<c033f921>] generic_make_request+0x151/0x230
[<c0132b90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
[<c04a5fac>] schedule+0x62c/0xcb0
[<c04a5fe0>] schedule+0x660/0xcb0
[<c0132b90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
[<c0126973>] del_timer+0x73/0x80
[<c033db0d>] blk_remove_plug+0x3d/0x80
[<c03feed9>] raid1d+0x289/0x2a0
[<c0414bb3>] md_thread+0x143/0x190
[<c0132b90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
[<c0102ed2>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x14
[<c0132b90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
[<c0414a70>] md_thread+0x0/0x190
[<c01011b5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Code: 00 40 c7 46 0c 90 30 15 c0 c7 46 10 90 31 15 c0 eb b9 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 8b 4c 24 04 8b 01 c1 e8 1e 8b 14 85 14 f4 63 c0 <8b> 82 0c 04 00 00 05 00 09 00 00 39 c2 74 05 e9 ac 73 03 00 89
Thanks for looking..
--
Phil Dier (ICGLink.com -- 615 370-1530 x733)
/* vim:set noai nocindent ts=8 sw=8: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-11 15:59 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS Phil Dier
@ 2005-08-12 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2005-08-12 4:17 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-12 17:35 ` Phil Dier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Neil Brown @ 2005-08-12 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phil Dier; +Cc: linux-kernel, ziggy, Scott Holdren, Jack Massari
On Thursday August 11, phil@icglink.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted an oops a few days ago from 2.6.12.3 [1]. Here are the results
> of my tests on 2.6.13-rc6. The kernel oopses, but it the box isn't completely
> hosed; I can still log in and move around. It appears that the only things that are
> locked are the apps that were doing i/o to the test partition. More detailed info
> about my configuration can be found here:
>
> <http://www.icglink.com/debug-2.6.13-rc6.html>
You don't seem to give details on how lvm is used to combine the md
arrays, though I'm not sure that would help particularly.
>
> Here is the oops:
>
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c0116dd0>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010207 (2.6.13-rc6)
> EIP is at kmap+0x10/0x30
> eax: 00000003 ebx: d0977440 ecx: c9efb470 edx: 00000000
> esi: c1000000 edi: 00000000 ebp: ce59d570 esp: f7adde18
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process md4_raid1 (pid: 6442, threadinfo=f7adc000 task=f70eda20)
> Stack: c014e0bd c9efb470 00000001 00000000 00000000 cb129000 00000001 e0c65f00
> f7dcbe18 087641ef 00000000 f7dcbe18 c014e146 f7dcbe18 f7addeb0 c3146940
> c033f03f f7dcbe18 f7addeb0 0021d906 00000000 0000003f 00000040 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c014e0bd>] __blk_queue_bounce+0x20d/0x260
--snip---
> Code: 00 40 c7 46 0c 90 30 15 c0 c7 46 10 90 31 15 c0 eb b9 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 8b 4c 24 04 8b 01 c1 e8 1e 8b 14 85 14 f4 63 c0 <8b> 82 0c 04 00 00 05 00 09 00 00 39 c2 74 05 e9 ac 73 03 00 89
>
The code is Oopsing in a call to kmap in arch/i386/highmem.c
The PageHighMem macro calls is_highmem(page_zone(page)).
page_zone is defined in mm.h
static inline struct zone *page_zone(struct page *page)
{
return zone_table[(page->flags >> ZONETABLE_PGSHIFT) &
ZONETABLE_MASK];
}
Now at the point of the crash, eax is
(page->flags >> ZONETABLE_PGSHIFT),
which is '3'. So it seems that this page is in zone 3.
However zone_table[3] is now in edx, and we can see it is '0'.
There are only 3 zones (normal, dma, highmem), so nothing should ever
by in zone 3. This page is clearly bad.
However that is as far as I can get. I don't know whether this is a
bad page pointer passed down from jfs or nfsd, a page pointer that was
corrupted by either lvm or md, or a valid page pointer that has
managed to get a bad zone number encoded in it's flags.
You could possibly put something like
struct bio_vec *from;
int i;
bio_for_each_segment(from, bio, i)
BUG_ON(page_zone(from->bv_page)==NULL);
in generic_make_requst in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c, just before
the call to q->make_request_fn.
This might trigger the bug early enough to see what is happening.
>
> Thanks for looking..
>
Thanks for testing.
NeilBrown
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-12 2:07 ` Neil Brown
@ 2005-08-12 4:17 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-12 17:35 ` Phil Dier
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Phil Dier @ 2005-08-12 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel, ziggy, scott, jack
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:07:21 +1000
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> On Thursday August 11, phil@icglink.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I posted an oops a few days ago from 2.6.12.3 [1]. Here are the results
> > of my tests on 2.6.13-rc6. The kernel oopses, but it the box isn't completely
> > hosed; I can still log in and move around. It appears that the only things that are
> > locked are the apps that were doing i/o to the test partition. More detailed info
> > about my configuration can be found here:
> >
> > <http://www.icglink.com/debug-2.6.13-rc6.html>
>
> You don't seem to give details on how lvm is used to combine the md
> arrays, though I'm not sure that would help particularly.
>
FYI:
vgdisplay -v vg1
Using volume group(s) on command line
Finding volume group "vg1"
--- Volume group ---
VG Name vg1
System ID
Format lvm2
Metadata Areas 2
Metadata Sequence No 8
VG Access read/write
VG Status resizable
MAX LV 255
Cur LV 1
Open LV 0
Max PV 255
Cur PV 2
Act PV 2
VG Size 410.00 GB
PE Size 128.00 MB
Total PE 3280
Alloc PE / Size 1093 / 136.62 GB
Free PE / Size 2187 / 273.38 GB
VG UUID XuRomW-O6Uw-oQGq-vdwD-YwMT-Dltj-NExFmV
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/vg1/home
VG Name vg1
LV UUID K7Gq9l-Vjte-ksFt-s0vn-ejqT-RGYc-5Aibtx
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
# open 0
LV Size 136.62 GB
Current LE 1093
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors 0
Block device 253:3
--- Physical volumes ---
PV Name /dev/md4
PV UUID VgHU6k-lZmE-j686-dvfX-OSsM-yh28-Jyfidn
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 1093 / 0
PV Name /dev/md7
PV UUID n4rVmy-rARO-a5mY-Iiqo-GvOx-2nbG-HluaTa
PV Status allocatable
Total PE / Free PE 2187 / 2187
md7 is in there to test live migration from smaller disks to larger ones.
>
> struct bio_vec *from;
> int i;
> bio_for_each_segment(from, bio, i)
> BUG_ON(page_zone(from->bv_page)==NULL);
>
> in generic_make_requst in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c, just before
> the call to q->make_request_fn.
> This might trigger the bug early enough to see what is happening.
I'll try this and report the results.
--
Phil Dier <phil@dier.us>
/* vim:set ts=8 sw=8 nocindent noai: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-12 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2005-08-12 4:17 ` Phil Dier
@ 2005-08-12 17:35 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-12 18:35 ` Sonny Rao
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Phil Dier @ 2005-08-12 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel, ziggy, scott, jack
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:07:21 +1000
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> You could possibly put something like
>
> struct bio_vec *from;
> int i;
> bio_for_each_segment(from, bio, i)
> BUG_ON(page_zone(from->bv_page)==NULL);
>
> in generic_make_requst in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c, just before
> the call to q->make_request_fn.
> This might trigger the bug early enough to see what is happening.
I've got tests running with this code in place, by I/O is so slow now
I don't think it's going to oops (or if it does, it'll be a while)..
Is there any other info I can collect to help track this down?
--
Phil Dier (ICGLink.com -- 615 370-1530 x733)
/* vim:set noai nocindent ts=8 sw=8: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-12 17:35 ` Phil Dier
@ 2005-08-12 18:35 ` Sonny Rao
2005-08-15 2:03 ` Phil Dier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sonny Rao @ 2005-08-12 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Phil Dier; +Cc: Neil Brown, linux-kernel, ziggy, scott, jack
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:35:05PM -0500, Phil Dier wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:07:21 +1000
> Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> > You could possibly put something like
> >
> > struct bio_vec *from;
> > int i;
> > bio_for_each_segment(from, bio, i)
> > BUG_ON(page_zone(from->bv_page)==NULL);
> >
> > in generic_make_requst in drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c, just before
> > the call to q->make_request_fn.
> > This might trigger the bug early enough to see what is happening.
>
>
> I've got tests running with this code in place, by I/O is so slow now
> I don't think it's going to oops (or if it does, it'll be a while)..
>
> Is there any other info I can collect to help track this down?
Well, while we are slowing things down in the name of debugging..
you might try setting the following debug options in your config:
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
Can anyone think of anything else?
According to the website you don't have these on right now.
Sonny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-12 18:35 ` Sonny Rao
@ 2005-08-15 2:03 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-15 2:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Phil Dier @ 2005-08-15 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sonny Rao; +Cc: neilb, linux-kernel, ziggy, scott, jack
I just got this:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address eeafefc0
printing eip:
c0188487
*pde = 00681067
*pte = 2eafe000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1
EIP: 0060:[<c0188487>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.13-rc6)
EIP is at inotify_inode_queue_event+0x17/0x130
eax: eeafefc0 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000200 edx: eeafee9c
esi: 00000000 edi: ef4cbe9c ebp: f66e1eac esp: f66e1e84
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process nfsd (pid: 6259, threadinfo=f66e0000 task=f6307b00)
Stack: eeafee9c c0536a34 ee900f6c f66e1eac c0179949 eeafefc0 23644d80 00000000
00000000 ef4cbe9c f66e1ed4 c01713ad eeafee9c 00000400 00000000 00000000
eeafee9c ee900f6c f0940f6c f6f0adf8 f66e1f00 c020caa1 ef4cbe9c ee900f6c
Call Trace:
[<c0103e7f>] show_stack+0x7f/0xa0
[<c0104030>] show_registers+0x160/0x1d0
[<c0104260>] die+0x100/0x180
[<c0116199>] do_page_fault+0x369/0x6ed
[<c0103aa3>] error_code+0x4f/0x54
[<c01713ad>] vfs_unlink+0x17d/0x210
[<c020caa1>] nfsd_unlink+0x161/0x240
[<c0207c64>] nfsd_proc_remove+0x44/0x90
[<c0206747>] nfsd_dispatch+0xd7/0x200
[<c0491b13>] svc_process+0x533/0x670
[<c02064dd>] nfsd+0x1bd/0x350
[<c01011e5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Code: ff ff ff 8b 5d f8 8b 75 fc 89 ec 5d c3 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 1c 8b 45 08 8b 55 08 05 24 01 00 00 89 45 ec <39> 82 24 01 00 00 74 5d f0 ff 8a 2c 01 00 00 0f 88 d1 0b 00 00
--
Phil Dier <phil@dier.us>
/* vim:set ts=8 sw=8 nocindent noai: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-15 2:03 ` Phil Dier
@ 2005-08-15 2:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-08-15 3:08 ` Robert Love
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2005-08-15 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Love
Cc: Sonny Rao, Neil Brown, Linux Kernel, ziggy, scott, jack,
Alexander Viro, Phil Dier
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Phil Dier wrote:
> I just got this:
>
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address eeafefc0
> printing eip:
> c0188487
> *pde = 00681067
> *pte = 2eafe000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 1
> EIP: 0060:[<c0188487>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010296 (2.6.13-rc6)
> EIP is at inotify_inode_queue_event+0x17/0x130
> eax: eeafefc0 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000200 edx: eeafee9c
> esi: 00000000 edi: ef4cbe9c ebp: f66e1eac esp: f66e1e84
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process nfsd (pid: 6259, threadinfo=f66e0000 task=f6307b00)
> Stack: eeafee9c c0536a34 ee900f6c f66e1eac c0179949 eeafefc0 23644d80 00000000
> 00000000 ef4cbe9c f66e1ed4 c01713ad eeafee9c 00000400 00000000 00000000
> eeafee9c ee900f6c f0940f6c f6f0adf8 f66e1f00 c020caa1 ef4cbe9c ee900f6c
> Call Trace:
> [<c0103e7f>] show_stack+0x7f/0xa0
> [<c0104030>] show_registers+0x160/0x1d0
> [<c0104260>] die+0x100/0x180
> [<c0116199>] do_page_fault+0x369/0x6ed
> [<c0103aa3>] error_code+0x4f/0x54
> [<c01713ad>] vfs_unlink+0x17d/0x210
> [<c020caa1>] nfsd_unlink+0x161/0x240
> [<c0207c64>] nfsd_proc_remove+0x44/0x90
> [<c0206747>] nfsd_dispatch+0xd7/0x200
> [<c0491b13>] svc_process+0x533/0x670
> [<c02064dd>] nfsd+0x1bd/0x350
> [<c01011e5>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
> Code: ff ff ff 8b 5d f8 8b 75 fc 89 ec 5d c3 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 1c 8b 45 08 8b 55 08 05 24 01 00 00 89 45 ec <39> 82 24 01 00 00 74 5d f0 ff 8a 2c 01 00 00 0f 88 d1 0b 00 00
int vfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
{
<snipped>
/* We don't d_delete() NFS sillyrenamed files--they still exist.
*/
if (!error && !(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED)) {
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
d_delete(dentry);
<==========
fsnotify_unlink(dentry, inode, dir);
}
return error;
}
static inline void fsnotify_unlink(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir)
{
<snipped>
inotify_inode_queue_event(inode, IN_DELETE_SELF, 0, NULL); <=====
<snipped>
}
void inotify_inode_queue_event(struct inode *inode, u32 mask, u32 cookie,
const char *name)
{
struct inotify_watch *watch, *next;
if (!inotify_inode_watched(inode)) <======
return;
<snipped>
}
static inline int inotify_inode_watched(struct inode *inode)
{
return !list_empty(&inode->inotify_watches); <===
}
I'm new here, if the inode isn't being watched, what's to stop d_delete
from removing the inode before fsnotify_unlink proceeds to use it?
Thanks,
Zwane
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-15 2:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
@ 2005-08-15 3:08 ` Robert Love
2005-08-15 3:20 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Robert Love @ 2005-08-15 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zwane Mwaikambo
Cc: Robert Love, Sonny Rao, Neil Brown, Linux Kernel, ziggy, scott,
jack, Alexander Viro, Phil Dier
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 20:40 -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> I'm new here, if the inode isn't being watched, what's to stop d_delete
> from removing the inode before fsnotify_unlink proceeds to use it?
Nothing. But check out
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7a91bf7f5c22c8407a9991cbd9ce5bb87caa6b4a
Should solve this problem?
Robert Love
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-15 3:08 ` Robert Love
@ 2005-08-15 3:20 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-08-15 17:44 ` Phil Dier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2005-08-15 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Love
Cc: Sonny Rao, Neil Brown, Linux Kernel, ziggy, scott, jack,
Alexander Viro, Phil Dier
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 20:40 -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>
> > I'm new here, if the inode isn't being watched, what's to stop d_delete
> > from removing the inode before fsnotify_unlink proceeds to use it?
>
> Nothing. But check out
>
> http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7a91bf7f5c22c8407a9991cbd9ce5bb87caa6b4a
That git web interface looks rather spiffy.
> Should solve this problem?
Seems to fit the bill perfectly.
Thanks,
Zwane
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS
2005-08-15 3:20 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
@ 2005-08-15 17:44 ` Phil Dier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Phil Dier @ 2005-08-15 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: ziggy, scott, jack
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:20:35 -0600 (MDT)
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Robert Love wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 20:40 -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> >
> > > I'm new here, if the inode isn't being watched, what's to stop d_delete
> > > from removing the inode before fsnotify_unlink proceeds to use it?
> >
> > Nothing. But check out
> >
> > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7a91bf7f5c22c8407a9991cbd9ce5bb87caa6b4a
>
> That git web interface looks rather spiffy.
>
> > Should solve this problem?
>
> Seems to fit the bill perfectly.
>
> Thanks,
> Zwane
>
So, for the record, I patched my 2.6.13-rc6 kernel with the patch at this location:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a91bf7f5c22c8407a9991cbd9ce5bb87caa6b4a;hp=1963c907b21e140082d081b1c8f8c2154593c7d7
and I will be testing it today.
Thanks to all of you guys.
--
Phil Dier (ICGLink.com -- 615 370-1530 x733)
/* vim:set noai nocindent ts=8 sw=8: */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-15 17:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-11 15:59 2.6.13-rc6 Oops with Software RAID, LVM, JFS, NFS Phil Dier
2005-08-12 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2005-08-12 4:17 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-12 17:35 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-12 18:35 ` Sonny Rao
2005-08-15 2:03 ` Phil Dier
2005-08-15 2:40 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-08-15 3:08 ` Robert Love
2005-08-15 3:20 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-08-15 17:44 ` Phil Dier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox