From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932162AbVHOHtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:49:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932164AbVHOHtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:49:50 -0400 Received: from mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.168]:30913 "EHLO mail27.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932162AbVHOHtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:49:50 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:49:20 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200508150929.21402.kernel@kolivas.org> <20050814172600.71a4a8cc.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20050814172600.71a4a8cc.zaitcev@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1442011.s2U9Ev5T4W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508151749.23116.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1442011.s2U9Ev5T4W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:26, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:29:20 +1000, Con Kolivas wrot= e: > > > Remember that dmesg diff you sent? That's the one. If you strace > > > the digikamcameracl, it probably keels over after EBUSY. > > > > Nice shot! Got it in one. bugzilla updated with confirmation. > > > > So how do we proceed with this one? Do I need to file a digikam bug > > report too? > > Since I never encountered it, I'm not versed in the switching of > the current altsetting. I suppose, this has to be discussed between > digikam developers and linux-usb-devel (Alan Stern probably knows > how that has to be done). It's very likely that all digikam needs > is to claim the interface after the altsetting was switched... > But I really do not know. Ok I've investigated further and had a pointer from Andrew Clayton who fixe= s=20 this problem with a gphoto2 upgrade. The issue is a libgphoto2 one and=20 kernels 2.6.13+ will require libgphoto2 2.1.6 or later to work properly. To sort this out before 2.6.13 comes out and it bites a lot of people - as= =20 most distros will have this problem - I suggest pointing them to the bugzil= la=20 entry as a FAQ: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D5063 Cheers, Con --nextPart1442011.s2U9Ev5T4W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDAEkDZUg7+tp6mRURAlfHAJ9MZG13Ct1g5ptqqxI/POfLV+S+CQCeMEAB dOm7lskwxWlk6zWkHFTI5Ko= =Jj/Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1442011.s2U9Ev5T4W--