From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: zach@vmware.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, chrisl@vmware.com, chrisw@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@mbligh.org,
pratap@vmware.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] i386 virtualization - Make generic set wrprotect a macro
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:25:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050815232502.GG3614@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508152300.j7FN0dD7005336@zach-dev.vmware.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:00:39PM -0700, zach@vmware.com wrote:
> Make the generic version of ptep_set_wrprotect a macro. This is good for
> code uniformity, and fixes the build for architectures which include pgtable.h
> through headers into assembly code, but do not define a ptep_set_wrprotect
> function.
This against the kernel coding style.
In fact, we are usually doing exactly the opposite.
What exactly is the technical problem this patch is trying to solve, IOW
which architectures are breaking for you?
> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
> Index: linux-2.6.13/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h 2005-08-12 12:12:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h 2005-08-15 13:54:42.000000000 -0700
> @@ -313,11 +313,12 @@
> #endif
>
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_SET_WRPROTECT
> -static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep)
> -{
> - pte_t old_pte = *ptep;
> - set_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, pte_wrprotect(old_pte));
> -}
> +#define ptep_set_wrprotect(__mm, __address, __ptep) \
> +({ \
> + pte_t __old_pte = *(__ptep); \
> + set_pte_at((__mm), (__address), (__ptep), \
> + pte_wrprotect(__old_pte)); \
> +})
> #endif
>
> #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SAME
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-15 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 23:00 [PATCH 5/6] i386 virtualization - Make generic set wrprotect a macro zach
2005-08-15 23:25 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-08-16 0:05 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-08-16 5:51 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050815232502.GG3614@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=pratap@vmware.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox