From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965099AbVHPEhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:37:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932603AbVHPEhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:37:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:65198 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932602AbVHPEhR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:37:17 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:37:02 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: zach@vmware.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, chrisl@vmware.com, chrisw@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@mbligh.org, pratap@vmware.com, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build Message-ID: <20050816043702.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> References: <200508152258.j7FMwdAb005304@zach-dev.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508152258.j7FMwdAb005304@zach-dev.vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default? thanks, -chris