public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] i386 / desc_empty macro is incorrect
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:05:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050816190509.GE7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430233FF.7090106@vmware.com>

From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>     I think that should be "|" instead of "+".

I think so too.  I merely moved the code here and didn't notice it in 
all this excitement.

0x00cf9a000xff306600  =>

Present CPL-0 32-bit code segment, base 0x0000ff30, limit 0xf6601 pages, 
for which desc_empty(desc) is true.

Thankfully, this is not used as a security check, but it can falsely 
overwrite TLS segments with carefully chosen base / limits.  I do not 
believe this is an issue in practice, but it is a kernel bug.

Nice catch.  Looks like it affects all 2.6.X kernels.

Chuck Ebbert noticed that the desc_empty macro is incorrect.  Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
---

diff --git a/include/asm-i386/processor.h b/include/asm-i386/processor.h
--- a/include/asm-i386/processor.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/processor.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct desc_struct {
 };
 
 #define desc_empty(desc) \
-		(!((desc)->a + (desc)->b))
+		(!((desc)->a | (desc)->b))
 
 #define desc_equal(desc1, desc2) \
 		(((desc1)->a == (desc2)->a) && ((desc1)->b == (desc2)->b))

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-16 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-16 17:03 [PATCH 3/6] i386 virtualization - Make ldt a desc struct Chuck Ebbert
2005-08-16 18:44 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-08-16 19:05   ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-08-16 19:18     ` [PATCH] i386 / desc_empty macro is incorrect Linus Torvalds
2005-08-16 20:41   ` [PATCH 3/6] i386 virtualization - Make ldt a desc struct Chris Wright
2005-08-16 20:56     ` Zachary Amsden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050816190509.GE7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox