From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:35:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050817063544.GA6519@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050817014857.GA3192@us.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> My tests are not finding even glaring races, so time to go and create
> some torture tests before getting too much more elaborate. 10,000
> eyes are nice (and Oleg's eyes do seem to be working especially well),
> but a good software-test sledgehammer has its uses as well.
i've merged this to the -rt tree, and find below a delta patch relative
to the previous patch.
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/exit.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/exit.c
+++ linux/kernel/exit.c
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ repeat:
__ptrace_unlink(p);
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&p->ptrace_list) || !list_empty(&p->ptrace_children));
__exit_signal(p);
- __exit_sighand(p);
/*
* Note that the fastpath in sys_times depends on __exit_signal having
* updated the counters before a task is removed from the tasklist of
Index: linux/kernel/signal.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/signal.c
+++ linux/kernel/signal.c
@@ -328,17 +328,19 @@ void __exit_sighand(struct task_struct *
struct sighand_struct * sighand = tsk->sighand;
/* Ok, we're done with the signal handlers */
- spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
tsk->sighand = NULL;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sighand->count))
sighand_free(sighand);
- spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
}
void exit_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- __exit_sighand(tsk);
+ spin_lock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
+ if (tsk->sighand != NULL) {
+ __exit_sighand(tsk);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
}
@@ -361,6 +363,7 @@ void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *t
if (tsk == sig->curr_target)
sig->curr_target = next_thread(tsk);
tsk->signal = NULL;
+ __exit_sighand(tsk);
spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
flush_sigqueue(&sig->shared_pending);
} else {
@@ -392,6 +395,7 @@ void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *t
sig->nvcsw += tsk->nvcsw;
sig->nivcsw += tsk->nivcsw;
sig->sched_time += tsk->sched_time;
+ __exit_sighand(tsk);
spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
sig = NULL; /* Marker for below. */
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 12:16 [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-11 15:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 1:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 8:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-12 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-16 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-16 11:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-16 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 1:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-17 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-08-17 14:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-17 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 11:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 1:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-19 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-08-19 18:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-18 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-10 17:11 Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-11 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-12 2:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-12 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-12 20:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 17:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-11 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-08-11 18:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-08-11 18:12 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050817063544.GA6519@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox