* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-16 21:49 ` Schedulers benchmark - Was: " Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 11:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
2 siblings, 2 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2005-08-17 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2272 bytes --]
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are schedulers benchmark (part2):
> [bits deleted]
Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python script.
| Build Statistics | Overall Statistics
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW
| (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452
staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366
spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937
zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617
zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814
zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587
zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534
nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665
where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d"
means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it
into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats
data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys
times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel
that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times).
I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
have hyper threads?
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
[-- Attachment #2: abb.py --]
[-- Type: text/x-python, Size: 5617 bytes --]
#!/bin/env python
import re, sys
version_re = re.compile("version\s+(\d+)")
timestamp_re = re.compile("timestamp\s+(\d+)")
cpu_re = re.compile("cpu\s*(\d+)" + "\s+(\d+)" * 12)
#the domain data is corrupted so we won't try to make any sense of it
domain_re = re.compile("domain\s*(\d+)" + "\s+(\d+)*")
time_re = re.compile("(\S+)\s+(\d+)m(\d+\.\d+)s")
schedstats_ver = "12"
def label(sched_descr):
name = sched_descr[0]
if name != "zaphod":
return name
for str in sched_descr[1:]:
if str[:12] == "max_ia_bonus":
miab = str[13]
else:
mtpb = str[14]
return name + "(" + miab + "," + mtpb + ")"
print " " * 12,
print "| %24s | %s" % ("Build Statistics", "Overall Statistics")
print "-" * 71
print "%13s|" % "Scheduler",
print "%6s" % "Real",
print "%6s" % "CPU",
print "%4s" % "SYS",
print "%5s" % "TPT",
print "|",
print "%6s" % "CPU",
print "%5s" % "TPT",
print "%8s" % "delay",
print "%7s" % "CXSW"
print " | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)"
print "-" * 71
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if not line:
break
if line.rstrip() != "scheduler:":
continue
scheduler_descr = []
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if line.rstrip() == "schedstat:":
break
if line != "\n":
scheduler_descr.append(line.rstrip())
line = sys.stdin.readline()
vem = version_re.match(line)
if not vem:
raise "Expected schedstats version: not found."
elif vem.groups()[0] != schedstats_ver:
raise "I'm built for schedstats version %s but %s found" % \
(schedstats_ver, vem.groups()[0])
line = sys.stdin.readline()
tsm = timestamp_re.match(line)
if not tsm:
raise "Expected timestamp: not found."
start_timestamp = int(tsm.groups()[0])
start_cpu = {}
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if line == "\n":
break
cpum = cpu_re.match(line)
if not cpum:
raise "Expected cpu data: not found."
else:
cpugs = cpum.groups()
icpu = []
for str in cpugs[1:]:
icpu.append(int(str))
start_cpu[cpugs[0]] = tuple(icpu)
line = sys.stdin.readline()
dm = domain_re.match(line)
if not dm:
raise "Expected domain data: not found."
else:
# ignore domain data as it's been corrupted
pass
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
tm = time_re.match(line)
if tm:
break
real_time = float(tm.groups()[1]) * 60 + float(tm.groups()[2])
line = sys.stdin.readline()
tm = time_re.match(line)
if not tm:
raise "Expected cpu time used in user mode"
user_time = float(tm.groups()[1]) * 60 + float(tm.groups()[2])
line = sys.stdin.readline()
tm = time_re.match(line)
if not tm:
raise "Expected cpu time used in system mode"
sys_time = float(tm.groups()[1]) * 60 + float(tm.groups()[2])
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if line.rstrip() == "schedstat:":
break
line = sys.stdin.readline()
vem = version_re.match(line)
if not vem:
raise "Expected schedstats version: not found."
elif vem.groups()[0] != schedstats_ver:
raise "I'm built for schedstats version %s but %s found" % \
(schedstats_ver, vem.groups()[0])
line = sys.stdin.readline()
tsm = timestamp_re.match(line)
if not tsm:
raise "Expected timestamp: not found."
stop_timestamp = int(tsm.groups()[0])
stop_cpu = {}
while True:
line = sys.stdin.readline()
if line == "\n":
break
cpum = cpu_re.match(line)
if not cpum:
raise "Expected cpu data: not found."
else:
cpugs = cpum.groups()
icpu = []
for str in cpugs[1:]:
icpu.append(int(str))
stop_cpu[cpugs[0]] = tuple(icpu)
line = sys.stdin.readline()
dm = domain_re.match(line)
if not dm:
raise "Expected domain data: not found."
else:
# ignore domain data as it's been corrupted
pass
delta_stats = {}
combined_delta_stats = []
for key in start_cpu.keys():
start = start_cpu[key]
stop = stop_cpu[key]
delta_array = []
for i in range(len(start)):
delta = stop[i] - start[i]
delta_array.append(delta)
try:
combined_delta_stats[i] += delta
except:
combined_delta_stats.append(delta)
delta_stats[key] = tuple(delta_array)
if start_timestamp < stop_timestamp:
duration = stop_timestamp - start_timestamp
else:
duration = (stop_timestamp + 2**32 - 1) - start_timestamp
total_time = user_time + sys_time
percent_sys = sys_time * 100 / total_time
percent_cpu = total_time * 100 / real_time
total_cpu = combined_delta_stats[9]
total_percent_cpu = float(total_cpu) * 100 / duration
total_delay = combined_delta_stats[10]
total_context_switches = combined_delta_stats[11]
print "%13s|" % label(scheduler_descr),
print "%5.1f" % real_time,
print "%5.1f" % total_time,
print "%3.2f" % percent_sys,
print "%4.1f" % percent_cpu,
print "|",
print "%5.1f" % (float(total_cpu) / 1000),
print "%4.1f" % total_percent_cpu,
print "%7.1f" % (float(total_delay) / 1000),
print "%7d" % total_context_switches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
@ 2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 11:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
1 sibling, 2 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-17 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:10, Peter Williams wrote:
> Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here are schedulers benchmark (part2):
> > [bits deleted]
>
> Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python script.
>
> | Build Statistics | Overall Statistics
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW
>
> | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452
> staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366
> spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937
> zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617
> zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814
> zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587
> zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534
> nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665
>
> where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d"
> means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it
> into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats
> data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys
> times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel
> that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times).
>
> I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
> in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
> other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
> that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
> same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
> theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
> caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
> differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
> have hyper threads?
That would only do something if there was a difference in 'nice' levels. What
you're seeing is the fact that balancing is intimately tied in with timeslice
size and you have increased idle time.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 21:35 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-17 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: LKML
Hi,
here are additional staircase scheduler benchmarks.
(make all -j8)
scheduler:
staircase
sched_compute=1
schedstat:
version 12
timestamp 4294712019
cpu0 1 0 0 31 0 18994 4568 7407 5903 10267 6976 14426
domain0 3 18574 18398 6 3938 193 4 0 18398 335 285 0 1191 175 0 0 285 4753 4508
75 6843 337 1 0 4508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2036 728 0
cpu1 3 0 0 59 0 15696 3324 6699 4661 5123 4628 12372
domain0 3 19445 19289 13 3418 162 1 0 19289 249 200 0 1178 186 0 0 200
3514 3314 37 5559 350 0 0 3314 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1504 494 0
ng02:/usr/src/linux-2.6.12# time make all -j8
[..]
real 49m48.619s
user 77m20.788s
sys 6m7.653s
schedstat:
version 12
timestamp 2734078
cpu0 1 0 0 31 0 356054 31106 152573 125255 2881936 7814746 324948
domain0 3 118014 117779 11 5092 248 5 0 117779 128809 95903 1 1894938
234516 0 0 95903 36014 31037 85 302927 42496 1 0 31037 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 48347 17439 0
cpu1 3 0 0 59 0 300542 19080 138093 89744 2264854 9434146 281462
domain0 3 644449 644005 45 9298 434 2 0 644005 124611 92742 0 1906903
231495 0 0 92742 25101 19062 56 357145 51607 0 0 19062 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
0 27318 10646 0
(make clean, reboot)
---
(make all -j64)
scheduler:
staircase
sched_compute=1
schedstat:
version 12
timestamp 4294716697
cpu0 0 0 0 33 0 19246 4863 7747 6286 9132 6575 14383
domain0 3 21947 21809 84 3054 59 7 0 21809 290 245 4 1171 149 0 0 245 5059 4835
51 6050 291 3 0 4835 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1979 673 0
cpu1 2 0 0 63 0 15351 3115 6435 4454 5300 5159 12236
domain0 3 22400 22237 14 3560 164 1 0 22235 259 207 0 1143 192 0 0 207
3267 3109 35 4064 241 1 0 3109 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1461 515 0
ng02:/usr/src/linux-2.6.12# time make all -j64
[..]
real 58m25.456s
user 76m23.481s
sys 9m7.176s
schedstat:
version 12
timestamp 3255484
cpu0 0 0 0 33 0 689742 98987 373969 324889 2692229 69800959 590755
domain0 3 612145 609500 141 1273549 124626 7 0 609500 160067 113714 8
24280104 2559138 0 0 113714 109551 98950 77 3340107 387551 3 0 98950 1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 108518 54439 0
cpu1 2 0 0 63 0 405307 27680 215244 106724 2508189 59419042 377627
domain0 3 858505 852898 2074 992349 91546 365 0 852886 138776 92602 62 24895205
2567033 0 0 92602 37703 27593 154 3880340 443218 2 0 27593 360 0 360 0
0 0 0 0 0 49080 20879 0
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-17 21:35 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-17 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 496 bytes --]
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:04, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are additional staircase scheduler benchmarks.
>
> (make all -j8)
>
> scheduler:
> staircase
>
> sched_compute=1
> real 49m48.619s
> user 77m20.788s
> sys 6m7.653s
Very nice thank you.
Since you are benchmarking, here is an unofficial update to the staircase
patch to the current non-plugsched version which will affect the results of
interbench (it won't change the benchmark results of compute mode).
Cheers,
Con
[-- Attachment #2: staircase_update.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 751 bytes --]
Index: linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched/kernel/staircase.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched.orig/kernel/staircase.c 2005-08-18 07:32:34.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched/kernel/staircase.c 2005-08-18 07:33:10.000000000 +1000
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ int sched_compute = 0;
*compute setting is reserved for dedicated computational scheduling
*and has ten times larger intervals.
*/
-#define _RR_INTERVAL ((10 * HZ / 1000) ? : 1)
-#define RR_INTERVAL() (_RR_INTERVAL * (1 + 9 * sched_compute))
+#define _RR_INTERVAL ((5 * HZ / 1000) ? : 1)
+#define RR_INTERVAL() (_RR_INTERVAL * (1 + 19 * sched_compute))
#define TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) \
((p)->prio < (rq)->curr->prio)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
1 sibling, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2005-08-17 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, LKML
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:10, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>>Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>here are schedulers benchmark (part2):
>>>[bits deleted]
>>
>>Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python script.
>>
>> | Build Statistics | Overall Statistics
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW
>>
>> | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452
>> staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366
>>spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937
>> zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617
>> zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814
>> zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587
>> zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534
>> nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665
>>
>>where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d"
>>means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it
>>into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats
>>data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys
>>times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel
>>that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times).
>>
>>I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
>>in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
>>other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
>>that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
>>same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
>>theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
>>caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
>>differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
>>have hyper threads?
>
>
> That would only do something if there was a difference in 'nice' levels.
Not in zaphod and spa_no_frills. They user dynamic priority. I may
rethink this as the argument for using dynamic priority mainly applies
to the entitlement based mode of zaphod.
> What
> you're seeing is the fact that balancing is intimately tied in with timeslice
> size and you have increased idle time.
I partially agree in that reducing the time slice size would reduce the
size of the effect but it's not the cause of the effect. The hyper
threading code is the cause.
BTW I'm wondering why the TPT column (i.e. cpu time / real elapsed
time) is so low for all schedulers. It's been a long time since I ran
your "contest" benchmarks for any of these schedulers but I seem to
recall that they all did a lot better than this when I extracted the
equivalent data from the output. Generally, I think that they all used
greater than 95% of the available cpu time which would be the equivalent
of TPT values of 190% or more in this case.
Another interesting thing to be noted in these numbers is that the cost
of the extra context switches caused by the "improved interactive
performance" measures doesn't seem to be very significant.
It also looks as if the overhead for zaphod's IA bonus mechanism needs
to be reduced.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
@ 2005-08-17 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:48 ` Peter Williams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-17 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:15 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:10, Peter Williams wrote:
> >>Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>here are schedulers benchmark (part2):
> >>>[bits deleted]
> >>
> >>Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python
> >> script.
> >>
> >> | Build Statistics | Overall Statistics
> >>
> >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW
> >>
> >> | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)
> >>
> >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452
> >> staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366
> >>spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937
> >> zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617
> >> zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814
> >> zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587
> >> zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534
> >> nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665
> >>
> >>where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d"
> >>means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it
> >>into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats
> >>data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys
> >>times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel
> >>that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times).
> >>
> >>I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
> >>in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
> >>other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
> >>that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
> >>same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
> >>theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
> >>caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
> >>differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
> >>have hyper threads?
> >
> > That would only do something if there was a difference in 'nice' levels.
>
> Not in zaphod and spa_no_frills. They user dynamic priority. I may
> rethink this as the argument for using dynamic priority mainly applies
> to the entitlement based mode of zaphod.
Static - like mainline and staircase - would be a good idea as the whole point
of hyperthread-aware 'nice' levels is they obey 'nice', not dynamic priority.
>
> > What
> > you're seeing is the fact that balancing is intimately tied in with
> > timeslice size and you have increased idle time.
>
> I partially agree in that reducing the time slice size would reduce the
> size of the effect but it's not the cause of the effect. The hyper
> threading code is the cause.
>
> BTW I'm wondering why the TPT column (i.e. cpu time / real elapsed
> time) is so low for all schedulers. It's been a long time since I ran
> your "contest" benchmarks for any of these schedulers but I seem to
> recall that they all did a lot better than this when I extracted the
> equivalent data from the output. Generally, I think that they all used
> greater than 95% of the available cpu time which would be the equivalent
> of TPT values of 190% or more in this case.
He did a make allyesconfig which is a bit different and probably far too i/o
bound. By the way a single kernel compile is hardly a reproducible benchmark.
Ideally he should be using my 'kernbench' benchmark (hint hint).
> Another interesting thing to be noted in these numbers is that the cost
> of the extra context switches caused by the "improved interactive
> performance" measures doesn't seem to be very significant.
I doubt this workload is running into that, the i/o bound nature of a kernel
compile means it is not really a pure cpu usage scalability measure, it's
just easy to do. Check the lkml archives for some comments by WLIrwin on the
limitations of using kernbench as a scalability measure.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-17 23:48 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:45 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2005-08-17 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, LKML
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:15 am, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>>Con Kolivas wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:10, Peter Williams wrote:
>>>
>>>>Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>here are schedulers benchmark (part2):
>>>>>[bits deleted]
>>>>
>>>>Here's a summary of your output generated using the attached Python
>>>>script.
>>>>
>>>> | Build Statistics | Overall Statistics
>>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Scheduler| Real CPU SYS TPT | CPU TPT delay CXSW
>>>>
>>>> | (secs) (secs) (%) (%) | (secs) (%) (secs)
>>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ingosched| 3128.5 5056.3 8.18 161.6 | 5379.5 171.9 159367.4 1556452
>>>> staircase| 3131.2 5032.6 8.09 160.7 | 5352.9 170.9 135193.0 1670366
>>>>spa_no_frills| 3103.8 5049.5 7.98 162.7 | 5266.7 169.7 172384.8 520937
>>>> zaphod(d,d)| 3561.7 4823.8 9.25 135.4 | 5132.0 144.1 148361.5 1771617
>>>> zaphod(d,0)| 3551.2 4809.9 9.19 135.4 | 5114.7 144.0 144022.0 1784814
>>>> zaphod(0,d)| 3126.8 5063.2 8.11 161.9 | 5278.1 168.8 173438.4 573587
>>>> zaphod(0,0)| 3105.5 5052.9 7.98 162.7 | 5254.8 169.2 165774.4 577534
>>>> nicksched| 3294.7 5095.1 9.10 154.6 | 5425.4 164.6 104298.2 2205665
>>>>
>>>>where the (x,y) after zaphod means (max_ia_bonus, max_tpt_bonus) and "d"
>>>>means default. I had to kill a few significant digits to squeeze it
>>>>into 71 columns. Overall statistics are extracted from the schedstats
>>>>data. In the "Build Statistics" "CPU" is the sum of the user and sys
>>>>times and "SYS" is the percentage of that which was sys time (as I feel
>>>>that is a better thing to compare than raw sys times).
>>>>
>>>>I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
>>>>in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
>>>>other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
>>>>that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
>>>>same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
>>>>theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
>>>>caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
>>>>differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
>>>>have hyper threads?
>>>
>>>That would only do something if there was a difference in 'nice' levels.
>>
>>Not in zaphod and spa_no_frills. They user dynamic priority. I may
>>rethink this as the argument for using dynamic priority mainly applies
>>to the entitlement based mode of zaphod.
>
>
> Static - like mainline and staircase - would be a good idea as the whole point
> of hyperthread-aware 'nice' levels is they obey 'nice', not dynamic priority.
Yes, but when zaphod's in "entitlement based" mode dynamic priority is a
better measure of "nice". But I think I'll modify spa_no_frills and
zaphod in "priority based" mode to use static priority (as you suggest).
>
>
>>>What
>>>you're seeing is the fact that balancing is intimately tied in with
>>>timeslice size and you have increased idle time.
>>
>>I partially agree in that reducing the time slice size would reduce the
>>size of the effect but it's not the cause of the effect. The hyper
>>threading code is the cause.
>>
>>BTW I'm wondering why the TPT column (i.e. cpu time / real elapsed
>>time) is so low for all schedulers. It's been a long time since I ran
>>your "contest" benchmarks for any of these schedulers but I seem to
>>recall that they all did a lot better than this when I extracted the
>>equivalent data from the output. Generally, I think that they all used
>>greater than 95% of the available cpu time which would be the equivalent
>>of TPT values of 190% or more in this case.
>
>
> He did a make allyesconfig which is a bit different and probably far too i/o
> bound. By the way a single kernel compile is hardly a reproducible benchmark.
> Ideally he should be using my 'kernbench' benchmark (hint hint).
Is that what I meant when I said "contest"? I wasn't sure that I used
the right name.
>
>
>>Another interesting thing to be noted in these numbers is that the cost
>>of the extra context switches caused by the "improved interactive
>>performance" measures doesn't seem to be very significant.
>
>
> I doubt this workload is running into that, the i/o bound nature of a kernel
> compile means it is not really a pure cpu usage scalability measure, it's
> just easy to do. Check the lkml archives for some comments by WLIrwin on the
> limitations of using kernbench as a scalability measure.
I should have calculated the average cpu consumption per context switch.
If that's reasonably large then the number of context switches won't
matter much. It's probably more a interesting number than the count of
context switches so I'll alter the script accordingly.
I would have liked to have done more analysis of the load balancing but
some of the schedstats data was corrupt. It should be roughly the same
for all schedulers if my attempts to make scheduling and load balancing
orthogonal have been successful. I was thinking of doing something
equivalent to a Chi-squared test to get a single number that describes
how good load balancing has been.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 23:48 ` Peter Williams
@ 2005-08-17 23:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 3:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-17 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:48 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:15 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> >>Con Kolivas wrote:
> > He did a make allyesconfig which is a bit different and probably far too
> > i/o bound. By the way a single kernel compile is hardly a reproducible
> > benchmark. Ideally he should be using my 'kernbench' benchmark (hint
> > hint).
>
> Is that what I meant when I said "contest"? I wasn't sure that I used
> the right name.
No, they're different things. Kernbench is a script to do the kernbench
measurement as used by M. Bligh. It's one of my family of benchmarks ;)
http://contest.kolivas.org
http://kernbench.kolivas.org
http://interbench.kolivas.org
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 23:45 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-19 3:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-19 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Peter Williams, LKML
Hi,
here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
cpusched=ingosched
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508181941
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.017 +/- 0.0267 0.458 100 100
Video 0.21 +/- 1.19 12.3 100 100
X 0.333 +/- 3.1 62.8 100 99.8
Burn 0.199 +/- 1.17 16 100 100
Write 0.048 +/- 0.209 4.08 100 100
Read 0.032 +/- 0.072 0.767 100 100
Compile 0.268 +/- 1.31 15 100 100
Memload 0.057 +/- 0.424 9.04 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.159 +/- 1.53 16.7 100 99.2
X 0.837 +/- 4.07 43.4 99.1 95.7
Burn 0.911 +/- 4.52 40.4 98.6 95.5
Write 1.08 +/- 4.43 32.7 99.2 94.2
Read 0.379 +/- 2.42 16.9 99.9 97.9
Compile 2.5 +/- 7.1 102 98.6 86.1
Memload 1.1 +/- 4.39 34.1 99.6 93.7
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.64 +/- 8.06 52 86.8 83.7
Video 17.3 +/- 31.5 110 32.9 23.2
Burn 32.9 +/- 57.8 460 20.5 11.8
Write 10.2 +/- 24.1 121 43.3 34.7
Read 4.67 +/- 15.8 75 52.1 47.3
Compile 34.5 +/- 52.9 135 20.3 11.2
Memload 4.62 +/- 15.2 126 75.2 66.9
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 6.09 +/- 14.9 91 94.3
Video 75.6 +/- 77.1 123 56.9
X 69.9 +/- 82.4 183 58.9
Burn 306 +/- 397 979 24.6
Write 43.9 +/- 68.2 468 69.5
Read 28.8 +/- 45 162 77.6
Compile 384 +/- 506 1622 20.6
Memload 25.5 +/- 37 157 79.7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=staircase
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508182051
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.113 +/- 0.4 2.02 100 100
Video 1.38 +/- 2.4 12 100 100
X 0.748 +/- 1.58 11 100 100
Burn 0.518 +/- 1.95 11 100 100
Write 0.257 +/- 1.27 11 100 100
Read 0.113 +/- 0.454 7.02 100 100
Compile 0.479 +/- 1.95 16.7 100 100
Memload 0.1 +/- 0.431 5.02 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.316 +/- 2.18 18.7 99.8 98.5
X 1.41 +/- 5.04 41.7 97.9 94.3
Burn 2.33 +/- 8.22 44.3 96.5 89.8
Write 1.38 +/- 5.49 44.4 98.6 92.8
Read 1.1 +/- 4.24 19.7 99.8 93.8
Compile 3.96 +/- 18.3 409 92.4 83.1
Memload 1.14 +/- 4.43 36.6 99.5 93.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.57 +/- 7.36 48 85.6 82.6
Video 14.6 +/- 27.5 90 35.6 26.3
Burn 40.5 +/- 62 186 19.2 9.92
Write 10.3 +/- 22.8 108 55.9 45
Read 3.84 +/- 12.6 72 74.7 67.3
Compile 40.6 +/- 62.4 183 18.6 9.61
Memload 2.61 +/- 8.8 55 69.1 63.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 17.6 +/- 29.5 159 85
Video 71.8 +/- 72.7 115 58.2
X 69.5 +/- 78.8 164 59
Burn 306 +/- 470 1278 24.6
Write 47.4 +/- 61.4 209 67.8
Read 19.9 +/- 35.1 163 83.4
Compile 1012 +/- 1111 1655 9
Memload 26.7 +/- 43.3 309 78.9
---
cpusched=staircase+patch
---patch---
Index: linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched/kernel/staircase.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched.orig/kernel/staircase.c 2005-08-18
07:32:34.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-plugsched/kernel/staircase.c 2005-08-18
07:33:10.000000000 +1000
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ int sched_compute = 0;
*compute setting is reserved for dedicated computational scheduling
*and has ten times larger intervals.
*/
-#define _RR_INTERVAL ((10 * HZ / 1000) ? : 1)
-#define RR_INTERVAL() (_RR_INTERVAL * (1 + 9 * sched_compute))
+#define _RR_INTERVAL ((5 * HZ / 1000) ? : 1)
+#define RR_INTERVAL() (_RR_INTERVAL * (1 + 19 * sched_compute))
#define TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) \
((p)->prio < (rq)->curr->prio)
---patch---
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-4 at datestamp 200508182129
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.087 +/- 0.331 2.02 100 100
Video 1.56 +/- 1.77 6.03 100 100
X 0.759 +/- 1.29 6.05 100 100
Burn 0.466 +/- 1.4 6.01 100 100
Write 0.138 +/- 0.556 5.03 100 100
Read 0.084 +/- 0.29 2.03 100 100
Compile 0.378 +/- 1.23 6.02 100 100
Memload 0.109 +/- 0.378 4.02 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.266 +/- 1.95 18.7 99.8 98.8
X 1.54 +/- 5.03 39.4 98.2 94
Burn 2.02 +/- 6.37 23.4 100 90.1
Write 1.42 +/- 5.01 39.4 99.5 92.2
Read 0.359 +/- 2.32 18.7 99.8 98.2
Compile 5.02 +/- 20.3 275 90.7 80.8
Memload 0.517 +/- 3.08 39.4 99.6 97.4
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.38 +/- 7.54 75 85.1 82.6
Video 15.3 +/- 28.7 90 35.2 25.5
Burn 38.6 +/- 60.1 180 19.3 10.2
Write 10.1 +/- 22.8 105 52.6 42.1
Read 5.84 +/- 16.8 119 63.6 57
Compile 43.3 +/- 66.4 195 17.8 9.19
Memload 3.81 +/- 12.2 72 66.8 60.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 9.51 +/- 19.9 80 91.3
Video 73 +/- 74.1 116 57.8
X 69 +/- 80.5 173 59.2
Burn 336 +/- 468 982 22.9
Write 45.2 +/- 59.1 183 68.9
Read 40.8 +/- 60.9 165 71
Compile 584 +/- 810 1481 14.6
Memload 32.5 +/- 52.1 285 75.4
---
cpusched=staircase
sched_compute=1
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508182323
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.016 +/- 0.0285 0.528 100 100
Video 0.218 +/- 0.666 3.21 100 100
X 0.451 +/- 4.07 90.6 99.8 99.8
Burn 72.4 +/- 384 2910 57.1 56.6
Write 1.03 +/- 17.1 408 99.3 99.2
Read 0.095 +/- 0.406 4 100 100
Compile 68.2 +/- 334 3298 58.6 57.4
Memload 0.216 +/- 1.56 34.6 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.264 +/- 2.03 19.7 99.9 98.7
X 4.88 +/- 14.3 148 95.4 79.6
Burn 149 +/- 867 6300 10.2 8.7
Write 2.33 +/- 9.54 202 97.9 88.8
Read 0.811 +/- 3.61 20.7 99.8 95.8
Compile 97.6 +/- 987 18012 23 19
Memload 1.15 +/- 4.85 79.7 99.4 94.1
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.91 +/- 9.08 74 89.4 85.9
Video 10 +/- 20.8 84 42.7 33.7
Burn 393 +/- 1510 8106 9.9 7.28
Write 12.2 +/- 28.9 134 54.1 43.6
Read 8.35 +/- 23.4 147 58.3 50.2
Compile 122 +/- 432 3608 14.6 7.55
Memload 9.96 +/- 27.9 140 57.3 48.3
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 6.96 +/- 15.6 64.1 93.5
Video 68 +/- 69.7 111 59.5
X 68.7 +/- 78.9 173 59.3
Burn 105 +/- 109 401 48.9
Write 45.8 +/- 60 140 68.6
Read 28.2 +/- 48.2 165 78
Compile 671 +/- 1668 7256 13
Memload 27.6 +/- 48.6 166 78.3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=spa_no_frills
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508182154
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.021 +/- 0.0602 0.752 100 100
Video 0.508 +/- 2.2 13.6 100 100
X 1.9 +/- 11.9 112 98.6 98.6
Burn 1561 +/- 5890 45545 0.412 0.412
Write 3.33 +/- 19 191 97.6 97.3
Read 0.057 +/- 0.651 15.9 100 100
Compile 1399 +/- 3774 17236 0.57 0.57
Memload 0.243 +/- 3.57 85.8 99.8 99.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.116 +/- 1.26 17.7 100 99.4
X 1.67 +/- 12.1 146 95.6 94.5
Burn 716 +/- 2159 15909 0.0602 0.0602
Write 3.17 +/- 18.6 374 94.4 88.3
Read 0.949 +/- 5.33 132 99.5 94.9
Compile 948 +/- 1355 3281 0.294 0.118
Memload 1.32 +/- 7.24 203 99.1 93
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.9 +/- 8.58 56 85.3 81.8
Video 15.7 +/- 28.8 85 33.6 24.1
Burn 648 +/- 813 3325 2.48 1
Write 11.9 +/- 35.4 336 57.8 48.1
Read 3.8 +/- 14.6 140 77.5 70.7
Compile 928 +/- 1177 3480 3.27 1.79
Memload 4.29 +/- 13.3 119 70.9 64.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 11 +/- 24.4 151 90.1
Video 69.9 +/- 70.3 87.7 58.9
X 67.2 +/- 76.4 137 59.8
Burn 644 +/- 1049 3393 13.4
Write 39.9 +/- 57.7 278 71.5
Read 17.5 +/- 30.3 156 85.1
Compile 476 +/- 697 2290 17.4
Memload 20.3 +/- 30.5 125 83.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=zaphod
max_ia_bonus=default
max_tpt_bonus=default
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508190006
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.02 +/- 0.0495 0.791 100 100
Video 0.28 +/- 2.16 35 100 100
X 0.584 +/- 5.88 113 99.8 99.7
Burn 0.994 +/- 5.62 96 100 99.8
Write 0.877 +/- 5.86 89.9 100 99.5
Read 0.501 +/- 4.53 94 100 99.8
Compile 1.22 +/- 7.29 104 99.8 99.5
Memload 0.508 +/- 3.61 51.1 100 99.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.02 +/- 7.25 79.4 95.4 94.9
X 1.28 +/- 8.11 117 95 94.2
Burn 1.61 +/- 10.1 134 95.5 94.6
Write 4.63 +/- 17.9 314 84.6 79.6
Read 1.45 +/- 8.6 100 94.9 93.4
Compile 2.38 +/- 10 136 94.8 89.9
Memload 2.09 +/- 9.54 124 94.9 90
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 2.36 +/- 10.9 68 86.5 83.8
Video 21 +/- 38 148 30.1 20.6
Burn 4.55 +/- 15.3 76 70.4 63.8
Write 26.1 +/- 73.1 504 37.2 27.5
Read 6.22 +/- 27.2 360 62.3 56.2
Compile 7.18 +/- 19.4 96 59.4 50.1
Memload 5.85 +/- 17.7 99 63 56.9
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 7.86 +/- 20.9 79.2 92.7
Video 82 +/- 86.7 165 54.9
X 128 +/- 213 847 43.9
Burn 26.6 +/- 38.5 197 79
Write 55.1 +/- 132 965 64.5
Read 22 +/- 33.6 227 82
Compile 46.8 +/- 60.5 225 68.1
Memload 29.8 +/- 48 396 77.1
---
max_ia_bonus=0
max_tpt_bonus=default
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508190109
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.021 +/- 0.058 1.01 100 100
Video 0.334 +/- 1.74 13.8 100 100
X 1.32 +/- 9.31 110 99.3 99.2
Burn 8198 +/- 16905 35815 0.348 0.174
Write 2.53 +/- 20.7 424 98.5 98.1
Read 0.171 +/- 3.48 85.2 99.8 99.8
Compile 1647 +/- 5681 24402 2.01 1.84
Memload 0.305 +/- 3.77 88.4 99.8 99.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.038 +/- 0.56 16.7 100 99.9
X 1.37 +/- 9.19 128 97 95.4
Burn 2701 +/- 6623 20512 0.224 0.168
Write 2.81 +/- 14.4 234 95.4 89.1
Read 0.852 +/- 4.12 60.5 99.7 95.4
Compile 3538 +/- 10559 38340 0.222 0.0554
Memload 1.46 +/- 7.19 109 98.4 93.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.31 +/- 6.7 60 86.6 83.5
Video 15.3 +/- 28.3 78 34.5 25.2
Burn 1786 +/- 6779 28716 4.79 4.26
Write 9.43 +/- 23.6 164 64 52.4
Read 3.2 +/- 11.8 76 69 64.4
Compile 1178 +/- 4079 26841 4.97 2.49
Memload 3.94 +/- 11.2 78 72 63.7
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 10.4 +/- 22.6 164 90.5
Video 70 +/- 70.5 88.2 58.8
X 67 +/- 76.8 176 59.9
Burn 277 +/- 385 1128 26.5
Write 39.2 +/- 57.2 242 71.8
Read 17.4 +/- 27.3 170 85.2
Compile 627 +/- 1401 5978 13.8
Memload 22.3 +/- 33.7 200 81.8
---
max_ia_bonus=default
max_tpt_bonus=0
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508190151
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.204 +/- 3.95 96 100 99.8
Video 0.327 +/- 2.38 34.1 100 100
X 0.815 +/- 6.12 93.3 100 99.5
Burn 0.577 +/- 2.88 29.2 100 100
Write 0.781 +/- 4.55 50 100 99.7
Read 0.68 +/- 6.77 98.3 99.8 99.5
Compile 1.18 +/- 7.93 113 99.7 99.5
Memload 0.539 +/- 6.02 125 99.8 99.5
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.06 +/- 7.19 76.4 95.1 94.3
X 1.43 +/- 8.72 122 95 93.9
Burn 1.34 +/- 7.84 79.3 96 94.7
Write 4.62 +/- 16.7 198 84.5 79.4
Read 1.48 +/- 9.35 154 94.3 93.1
Compile 2.81 +/- 10.6 135 94.8 88
Memload 1.89 +/- 8.88 79.3 94.8 90.9
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 2.92 +/- 12.4 81 88.8 84.2
Video 22.5 +/- 39.6 132 30.1 19.8
Burn 4.66 +/- 15.3 84 60.2 52.5
Write 10.3 +/- 26 184 61.6 50.1
Read 4.25 +/- 16.9 174 73.8 67.9
Compile 8.38 +/- 21.4 140 54.6 44.9
Memload 6.03 +/- 17.5 90 59.3 51.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 7.8 +/- 21.2 77.2 92.8
Video 80.5 +/- 84.8 163 55.4
X 129 +/- 212 828 43.6
Burn 24.3 +/- 33.3 146 80.4
Write 48.7 +/- 107 820 67.3
Read 21 +/- 30.8 124 82.7
Compile 43.1 +/- 50.9 171 69.9
Memload 32.2 +/- 49.2 328 75.6
---
max_ia_bonus=0
max_tpt_bonus=0
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508190325
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.024 +/- 0.103 2.06 100 100
Video 0.399 +/- 1.88 12.7 100 100
X 1.31 +/- 9.34 112 99.3 99.2
Burn 172 +/- 278 503 20 20
Write 1.67 +/- 12.4 131 98.8 98.8
Read 0.035 +/- 0.0722 0.833 100 100
Compile 520 +/- 770 2943 3.45 3.45
Memload 0.669 +/- 6.24 99 99.7 99.7
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.178 +/- 1.64 17.7 99.9 99
X 1.53 +/- 10.3 137 96.4 94.6
Burn 465 +/- 873 8110 0.12 0.0601
Write 2.44 +/- 13.3 342 96.2 90.4
Read 1.82 +/- 5.47 18 99.9 89.3
Compile 916 +/- 3017 22968 0.118 0.059
Memload 1.11 +/- 5.09 107 99.6 94
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.44 +/- 6.96 45 90 87.2
Video 16.6 +/- 30 80 33.7 23.9
Burn 12076 +/- 37271 105484 0.508 0.508
Write 10.4 +/- 25.4 175 53.6 43.5
Read 6.62 +/- 20.9 126 68 59.8
Compile 407 +/- 508 884 14.9 10.6
Memload 4.12 +/- 13.6 84 79.9 73.5
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 11.3 +/- 24.4 108 89.9
Video 72.7 +/- 73.2 87.1 57.9
X 67.8 +/- 77.4 162 59.6
Burn 211 +/- 225 978 32.1
Write 41.6 +/- 62.7 314 70.6
Read 18.8 +/- 30.2 138 84.2
Compile 210 +/- 216 461 32.2
Memload 19.9 +/- 36 254 83.4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=nicksched
Using 1844991 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.13-rc6-2 at datestamp 200508190404
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.015 +/- 0.0496 0.707 100 100
Video 0.061 +/- 0.536 10.6 100 100
X 0.15 +/- 1.24 14 100 100
Burn 0.067 +/- 0.996 19.9 100 100
Write 0.314 +/- 4.01 95.3 100 99.8
Read 0.024 +/- 0.0544 1.04 100 100
Compile 0.145 +/- 1.43 24 100 100
Memload 0.046 +/- 0.226 3.79 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.185 +/- 1.68 16.7 99.8 99
X 0.883 +/- 5.42 83.3 98.2 95.4
Burn 0.181 +/- 1.7 19.9 99.9 99
Write 2.22 +/- 13.4 344 95.6 89.4
Read 0.864 +/- 4.46 100 99.4 95
Compile 3.31 +/- 10.2 169 96.3 81.6
Memload 1.22 +/- 4.57 34.2 99.6 93
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 1.4 +/- 6.82 48 90.3 86.6
Video 19 +/- 35.7 144 30.2 21.3
Burn 67.1 +/- 195 1500 12.4 7.06
Write 11.3 +/- 27.5 189 54.8 43.9
Read 7.67 +/- 24.2 143 52.6 46.6
Compile 74 +/- 223 1800 11.3 6.36
Memload 6 +/- 17.5 120 66.2 57.3
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 6.81 +/- 16 84.9 93.6
Video 80.5 +/- 83.8 159 55.4
X 72 +/- 84.1 196 58.1
Burn 342 +/- 580 2777 22.6
Write 44.9 +/- 69.9 423 69
Read 24.6 +/- 41.5 165 80.3
Compile 457 +/- 590 1435 18
Memload 26.3 +/- 38.4 153 79.2
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 3:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 4:26 ` Peter Williams
0 siblings, 2 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-08-19 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: Con Kolivas, Peter Williams, LKML
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
horribly.
I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell
@ 2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 4:41 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-19 4:26 ` Peter Williams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-19 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Revell; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, Peter Williams, LKML
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
>
> The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
>
> Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
> default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
> max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
> horribly.
The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of
what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of
this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this.
> I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
> 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-19 4:41 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-19 4:36 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2005-08-19 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Lee Revell, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
>>
>>The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
>>
>>Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
>>default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
>>max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
>>horribly.
>
>
> The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of
> what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of
> this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this.
>
>
>>I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
>>2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
>
>
> Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
> mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.
Maybe we could use interbench to find a nice value for X that doesn't
destroy Audio and Video? The results that I just posted for
spa_no_frills with X reniced to -10 suggest that the other schedulers
could cope with something closer to zero.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 4:41 ` Peter Williams
@ 2005-08-19 4:36 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 20:13 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-19 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: Lee Revell, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:41 pm, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
> >>
> >>The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
> >>
> >>Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
> >>default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
> >>max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
> >>horribly.
> >
> > The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme
> > exaggeration of what happens during a compile and this is done to
> > increase the sensitivity of this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a
> > perfect score in this.
> >
> >>I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
> >>2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
> >
> > Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
> > mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.
>
> Maybe we could use interbench to find a nice value for X that doesn't
> destroy Audio and Video? The results that I just posted for
> spa_no_frills with X reniced to -10 suggest that the other schedulers
> could cope with something closer to zero.
I don't see the point. X works fine as is without renicing not withstanding
these extreme loads in interbench. Furthermore, reworking of xorg code to not
spin the cpu unnecessarily when the gpu is busy is underway and tuning the
cpu scheduler unfairly for an X server that will no longer behave so badly is
inappropriate.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 4:36 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-19 20:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-08-19 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Peter Williams, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:36 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:41 pm, Peter Williams wrote:
> > Maybe we could use interbench to find a nice value for X that doesn't
> > destroy Audio and Video? The results that I just posted for
> > spa_no_frills with X reniced to -10 suggest that the other schedulers
> > could cope with something closer to zero.
>
> I don't see the point. X works fine as is without renicing not withstanding
> these extreme loads in interbench. Furthermore, reworking of xorg code to not
> spin the cpu unnecessarily when the gpu is busy is underway and tuning the
> cpu scheduler unfairly for an X server that will no longer behave so badly is
> inappropriate.
See, that's where we disagree, I certainly don't believe X "works fine".
Compared to MacOS and (especially) Windows the Linux desktop is WAY
sluggish.
For example when I cycle through windows with alt-tab in X, it can take
5-10 seconds for each to render. I can see the application's widgets
being drawn one at a time, then finally the border. Repeated
alt-tabbing between the same two windows seems to cause a CPU intensive
redraw of the entire window. It's as if X just discards the rendered
contents of a window as soon as it's obscured.
On Windows this works as expected - cycling through windows whose
contents have already been rendered is *instantaneous*.
I agree that tweaking the scheduler is probably pointless, as long as X
is burning gazillions of CPU cycles redrawing things that don't need to
be redrawn.
Then again even the OSX scheduler has hooks for the GUI. Presumably
they concluded that the desktop responsiveness problem could not be
adequately solved within the framework of a general purpose UNIX
scheduler.
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 20:13 ` Lee Revell
@ 2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-20 3:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 18:52 ` Lee Revell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-20 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Revell; +Cc: Peter Williams, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:13, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 14:36 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:41 pm, Peter Williams wrote:
> > > Maybe we could use interbench to find a nice value for X that doesn't
> > > destroy Audio and Video? The results that I just posted for
> > > spa_no_frills with X reniced to -10 suggest that the other schedulers
> > > could cope with something closer to zero.
> >
> > I don't see the point. X works fine as is without renicing not
> > withstanding these extreme loads in interbench. Furthermore, reworking of
> > xorg code to not spin the cpu unnecessarily when the gpu is busy is
> > underway and tuning the cpu scheduler unfairly for an X server that will
> > no longer behave so badly is inappropriate.
>
> See, that's where we disagree, I certainly don't believe X "works fine".
> Compared to MacOS and (especially) Windows the Linux desktop is WAY
> sluggish.
>
> For example when I cycle through windows with alt-tab in X, it can take
> 5-10 seconds for each to render. I can see the application's widgets
> being drawn one at a time, then finally the border. Repeated
> alt-tabbing between the same two windows seems to cause a CPU intensive
> redraw of the entire window. It's as if X just discards the rendered
> contents of a window as soon as it's obscured.
>
> On Windows this works as expected - cycling through windows whose
> contents have already been rendered is *instantaneous*.
>
> I agree that tweaking the scheduler is probably pointless, as long as X
> is burning gazillions of CPU cycles redrawing things that don't need to
> be redrawn.
>
> Then again even the OSX scheduler has hooks for the GUI. Presumably
> they concluded that the desktop responsiveness problem could not be
> adequately solved within the framework of a general purpose UNIX
> scheduler.
It's an X problem and it's being fixed. Get over it, we're not tuning the
scheduler for a broken app.
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-20 3:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 18:52 ` Lee Revell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-08-20 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Peter Williams, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 10:31 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:13, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > I agree that tweaking the scheduler is probably pointless, as long as X
> > is burning gazillions of CPU cycles redrawing things that don't need to
> > be redrawn.
> >
> > Then again even the OSX scheduler has hooks for the GUI. Presumably
> > they concluded that the desktop responsiveness problem could not be
> > adequately solved within the framework of a general purpose UNIX
> > scheduler.
>
> It's an X problem and it's being fixed. Get over it, we're not tuning the
> scheduler for a broken app.
I wasn't saying it would be a smart thing to do, the OSX thing is
interesting that's all. I think we're in violent agreement about the X
problem, do you have a link to any specific work on this (off list)?
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-20 3:04 ` Lee Revell
@ 2005-08-20 18:52 ` Lee Revell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-08-20 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: Peter Williams, Michal Piotrowski, LKML
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 10:31 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> It's an X problem and it's being fixed. Get over it, we're not tuning
> the scheduler for a broken app.
>
You're right, this problem seems much, much better in Xorg 6.8.2. I
think the Damage extension might be responsible. There's definitely
something different happening because when I switch windows quickly,
instead of a grey box that gets slowly re-packed with widgets, I see a
black box that packs very fast, and seems to be filled in large
rectangular chunks rather than one widget at a time. X is also using a
lot less CPU. Very nice work...
Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-19 4:26 ` Peter Williams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Williams @ 2005-08-19 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lee Revell; +Cc: Michal Piotrowski, Con Kolivas, LKML
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
>
>
> The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
>
> Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
> default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
> max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
> horribly.
>
> I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
> 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Even spa_no_frills, which does absolutely nothing to help interactive
(or other special interest) tasks, can cope in these circumstances as
illustrated by these results from my (relatively old) SMP machine show:
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X nice -10 in the presence of
simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.01 +/- 0.129 2 100 99.3
Video 0.007 +/- 0.0818 1 100 99.3
Burn 0.006 +/- 0.0817 1 100 99.3
Write 0.033 +/- 0.271 3 99.3 98
Read 0.046 +/- 0.337 3 98.4 97
Compile 0.023 +/- 0.208 2 99.3 98.3
Memload 0.043 +/- 0.31 3 98.1 97
This machine isn't directly comparable with Michal's so for comparison
here are the results from "out of the box" Zaphod on the same machine:
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.02 +/- 0.2 2 99.3 98.7
Video 0.007 +/- 0.0818 1 100 99.3
Burn 0.023 +/- 0.208 2 99.3 98.3
Write 0.147 +/- 0.949 12 94.7 93.2
Read 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Compile 2.94 +/- 10.7 105 76.8 71.6
Memload 0.017 +/- 0.153 2 100 98.7
As you can see there's evidence in these numbers the file writes are
implicated in the bad numbers for the Compile load (which is a mixture
of Burn, Read, Write and (I think) Memload). So testing with different
I/O schedulers might be interesting.
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-17 11:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-17 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: LKML
Hi,
On 8/17/05, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> I was intrigued by the fact that zaphod(d,d) and zaphod(d,0) take longer
> in real time but use less cpu. I was assuming that this meant that some
> other job was getting some cpu but the schedstats data doesn't support
> that. Also it wouldn't make sense anyway as you'd expect jobs doing the
> same amount of work to use roughly the same amount of cpu. My latest
> theory is that your machine has hyper threads and this artifact is
> caused by the mechanism in the scheduler for handling tasks with
> differing priority in sibling hyper thread channels. Does your system
> have hyper threads?
Yes. Please see my first mail:
> info:
> distro: debian 3.1
> cpu: pentium 4 (ht enabled)
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-16 21:49 ` Schedulers benchmark - Was: " Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
@ 2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 1:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-21 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Hi,
here are kernbench results:
cpusched=ingosched
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 365,4
User Time 620,8
System Time 64,6
Percent CPU 187,2
Context Switches 38296,8
Sleeps 37867
(reboot)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=staircase
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 611,6
User Time 616,4
System Time 81
Percent CPU 114,8
Context Switches 96470,2
Sleeps 122413
(reboot)
---
sched_compute=1
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 354,6
User Time 615,2
System Time 61
Percent CPU 190
Context Switches 9876,4
Sleeps 18510,4
(reboot)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=spa_no_frills
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 352
User Time 624
System Time 60
Percent CPU 193,8
Context Switches 19185,4
Sleeps 18205,8
(reboot)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=zaphod
max_ia_bonus=default
max_tpt_bonus=default
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 389,4
User Time 607,8
System Time 58,8
Percent CPU 170,8
Context Switches 44965,2
Sleeps 27352,8
(reboot)
---
max_ia_bonus=0
max_tpt_bonus=default
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 351,4
User Time 623,4
System Time 59,8
Percent CPU 194
Context Switches 21264,6
Sleeps 20284,6
(reboot)
---
max_ia_bonus=default
max_tpt_bonus=0
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Elapsed Time 387,6
User Time 608
System Time 57,6
Percent CPU 171,6
Context Switches 43684,8
Sleeps 26757,4
(reboot)
---
max_ia_bonus=0
max_tpt_bonus=0
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 351
User Time 623,4
System Time 60,4
Percent CPU 194,2
Context Switches 21241,8
Sleeps 19751,6
(reboot)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cpusched=nicksched
./kernbench -M -o 128
[..]
Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Elapsed Time 776,4
User Time 590,8
System Time 85,4
Percent CPU 95,4
Context Switches 99664,8
Sleeps 147169
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-21 1:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:16 ` Michal Piotrowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-21 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: LKML
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> here are kernbench results:
Nice to see you using kernbench :)
> ./kernbench -M -o 128
> [..]
> Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically
from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not
sure what 128 represents.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-21 1:47 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-21 4:16 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:22 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-21 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: LKML
Hi,
On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi
>
> > here are kernbench results:
>
> Nice to see you using kernbench :)
>
> > ./kernbench -M -o 128
> > [..]
> > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
>
> Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically
> from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not
> sure what 128 represents.
>
> Cheers,
> Con
>
No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;).
Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and
-j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-21 4:16 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-21 4:22 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:44 ` Michal Piotrowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-21 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: LKML
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:16, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > > here are kernbench results:
> >
> > Nice to see you using kernbench :)
> >
> > > ./kernbench -M -o 128
> > > [..]
> > > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
> >
> > Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out
> > automatically from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you
> > have 4 cpus? Not sure what 128 represents.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Con
>
> No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;).
>
> Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and
> -j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.
Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash territory
and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
Cheers,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-21 4:22 ` Con Kolivas
@ 2005-08-21 4:44 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:49 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-21 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Con Kolivas; +Cc: LKML
On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash territory
> and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
>
> Cheers,
> Con
>
Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load
average > 1500 ;).
BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my system...
I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest -ck.
Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support".
Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-21 4:44 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-21 4:49 ` Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2005-08-21 4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski; +Cc: LKML
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:44, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > Well it will survive all right, but eventually get into swap thrash
> > territory and that's not a meaningful cpu scheduler benchmark.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Con
>
> Ok. How about make -j? It's one of kernbench test runs, on my box load
> average > 1500 ;).
Just do that if you wish to overload the system. It's a vm benchmark. No doubt
the cpu scheduler contributes to how the vm behaves, but it isn't a primary
cpu scheduler test.
> BTW I have only 1 gb ram, so high values of -j are road to hell for my
> system... I'm still learning, but it's fun ;). Now I'll try your latest
> -ck. Thanks for "1Gb Low Memory Support".
You're welcome,
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread
* Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
2005-08-16 21:49 ` Schedulers benchmark - Was: " Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
@ 2005-08-21 1:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <4309125B.4020707@bigpond.net.au>
2 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Michal Piotrowski @ 2005-08-21 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Williams; +Cc: LKML
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
oops when shuting down system
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
After kernbenching nicksched (heav load make -j128) I just record
results on cd and shutdown system.
[3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
plugsched, nicksched, sysfs, vfs
[4.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
Linux version 2.6.13-rc6-2 (root@ng02.pl) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian
1:3.3.5-13)) #14 SMP Mon Aug 15 08:50:46 CEST 2005
[5.] Output of Oops
Aug 21 03:21:32 ng02 shutdown[9216]: shutting down for system halt
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: c0003eac
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: PREEMPT SMP
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: Modules linked in: nls_iso8859_1 isofs
nls_base zliAug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c0003eac>] Not tainted VLI
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.13-rc6-2)
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: EIP is at 0xc0003eac
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: eax: e668b000 ebx: f7cec680 ecx:
00000000 edxAug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: esi: f7cec688 edi:
c036dd04 ebp: ca8f5440 espAug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: ds: 007b
es: 007b ss: 0068
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: Process udev (pid: 9771,
threadinfo=cfa39000 task=fAug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: Stack: c02386f2
f7cec680 e668b000 f6cfb0c0 c01a8fedAug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel:
00000000 f6cfb0c0 f744e980 080c6f48 00000000Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02
kernel: f744e980 080c6f48 00001000 c016e629 f744e980Aug 21
03:21:33 ng02 kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c02386f2>] class_device_attr_show+0x32/0x40
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c01a8fed>] fill_read_buffer+0x5d/0xa0
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c01a9131>] sysfs_read_file+0x31/0x70
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c016e629>] vfs_read+0xe9/0x1b0
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c016ea11>] sys_read+0x51/0x80
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: [<c0103125>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Aug 21 03:21:33 ng02 kernel: Code: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Aug 21 03:21:37 ng02 kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped.
[7.] Environment
[7.1.] Software
If some fields are empty or look unusual you may have an old version.
Compare to the current minimal requirements in Documentation/Changes.
Linux ng02.pl 2.6.13-rc6-2 #14 SMP Mon Aug 15 08:50:46 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
Gnu C 3.3.5
Gnu make 3.80
binutils 2.15
util-linux 2.12p
mount 2.12p
module-init-tools 3.2-pre1
e2fsprogs 1.37
reiserfsprogs line
reiser4progs line
PPP 2.4.3
nfs-utils 1.0.6
Linux C Library 2.3.2
Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.3.2
Linux C++ Library 6.0.4
Procps 3.2.1
Net-tools 1.60
Console-tools 0.2.3
Sh-utils 5.2.1
udev 056
Modules Loaded md5 ipv6 af_packet snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec
snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore
snd_page_alloc hw_random ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore sk98lin i2c_isa
i2c_i801 i2c_core ide_cd cdrom unix
[8.] Config file
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.13-rc6
# Mon Aug 15 08:41:41 2005
#
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y
#
# Code maturity level options
#
# CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is not set
CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y
CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32
#
# General setup
#
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-2"
CONFIG_SWAP=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y
CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3=y
CONFIG_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_AUDIT=y
CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL=y
CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y
CONFIG_KOBJECT_UEVENT=y
CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set
CONFIG_PLUGSCHED=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_DEFAULT_INGO=y
# CONFIG_CPUSCHED_DEFAULT_STAIRCASE is not set
# CONFIG_CPUSCHED_DEFAULT_SPA_NF is not set
# CONFIG_CPUSCHED_DEFAULT_ZAPHOD is not set
# CONFIG_CPUSCHED_DEFAULT_NICK is not set
# CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_INGO=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_STAIRCASE=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_SPA=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_SPA_NF=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_ZAPHOD=y
CONFIG_CPUSCHED_NICK=y
CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set
CONFIG_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_BUG=y
CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y
CONFIG_FUTEX=y
CONFIG_EPOLL=y
CONFIG_SHMEM=y
CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_FUNCTIONS=0
CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_LABELS=0
CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_LOOPS=0
CONFIG_CC_ALIGN_JUMPS=0
# CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set
CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0
#
# Loadable module support
#
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
CONFIG_OBSOLETE_MODPARM=y
CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL=y
CONFIG_KMOD=y
CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y
#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_X86_PC=y
# CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set
# CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set
# CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ is not set
# CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is not set
# CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set
# CONFIG_X86_VISWS is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set
# CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set
# CONFIG_M386 is not set
# CONFIG_M486 is not set
# CONFIG_M586 is not set
# CONFIG_M586TSC is not set
# CONFIG_M586MMX is not set
# CONFIG_M686 is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set
CONFIG_MPENTIUM4=y
# CONFIG_MK6 is not set
# CONFIG_MK7 is not set
# CONFIG_MK8 is not set
# CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set
# CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set
# CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set
# CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set
# CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set
CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y
CONFIG_X86_XADD=y
CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y
CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y
CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
CONFIG_SMP=y
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL=m
CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y
# CONFIG_TOSHIBA is not set
# CONFIG_I8K is not set
# CONFIG_X86_REBOOTFIXUPS is not set
CONFIG_MICROCODE=y
CONFIG_X86_MSR=y
CONFIG_X86_CPUID=y
#
# Firmware Drivers
#
# CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
CONFIG_FLATMEM=y
CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y
# CONFIG_HIGHPTE is not set
# CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set
CONFIG_MTRR=y
# CONFIG_EFI is not set
CONFIG_IRQBALANCE=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y
CONFIG_SECCOMP=y
# CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
CONFIG_HZ_1000=y
CONFIG_HZ=1000
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100000
#
# Power management options (ACPI, APM)
#
CONFIG_PM=y
# CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set
#
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
#
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
#
# APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS Support
#
# CONFIG_APM is not set
#
# CPU Frequency scaling
#
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=m
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=m
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE is not set
#
# CPUFreq processor drivers
#
# CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ is not set
# CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6 is not set
# CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7 is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GX_SUSPMOD is not set
# CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO is not set
# CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH is not set
CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=m
# CONFIG_X86_LONGRUN is not set
# CONFIG_X86_LONGHAUL is not set
#
# shared options
#
CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_LIB=m
#
# Bus options (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, MCA, ISA)
#
CONFIG_PCI=y
# CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_GOMMCONFIG is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set
CONFIG_PCI_GOANY=y
CONFIG_PCI_BIOS=y
CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT=y
CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG=y
# CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS is not set
# CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not set
CONFIG_PCI_LEGACY_PROC=y
CONFIG_PCI_NAMES=y
# CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API=y
# CONFIG_ISA is not set
# CONFIG_MCA is not set
# CONFIG_SCx200 is not set
#
# PCCARD (PCMCIA/CardBus) support
#
# CONFIG_PCCARD is not set
#
# PCI Hotplug Support
#
#
# Executable file formats
#
CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y
CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT=m
CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=m
#
# Networking
#
CONFIG_NET=y
#
# Networking options
#
CONFIG_PACKET=m
CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP=y
CONFIG_UNIX=m
CONFIG_XFRM=y
CONFIG_XFRM_USER=m
CONFIG_NET_KEY=m
CONFIG_INET=y
CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST=y
# CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER is not set
CONFIG_IP_FIB_HASH=y
# CONFIG_IP_PNP is not set
CONFIG_NET_IPIP=m
# CONFIG_NET_IPGRE is not set
# CONFIG_IP_MROUTE is not set
CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES=y
CONFIG_INET_AH=m
CONFIG_INET_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_INET_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_IP_TCPDIAG=m
CONFIG_IP_TCPDIAG_IPV6=y
# CONFIG_TCP_CONG_ADVANCED is not set
CONFIG_TCP_CONG_BIC=y
#
# IP: Virtual Server Configuration
#
# CONFIG_IP_VS is not set
CONFIG_IPV6=m
CONFIG_IPV6_PRIVACY=y
CONFIG_INET6_AH=m
CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m
CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=m
CONFIG_INET6_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=m
CONFIG_NETFILTER=y
CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y
#
# IP: Netfilter Configuration
#
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_CT_ACCT=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_FTP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_IRC=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TFTP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_AMANDA=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_QUEUE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_IPTABLES=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_LIMIT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_IPRANGE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_MAC=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_PKTTYPE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_MARK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_MULTIPORT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_TOS=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RECENT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ECN=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_DSCP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_AH_ESP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_LENGTH=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_TTL=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_TCPMSS=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_HELPER=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_STATE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_CONNTRACK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_OWNER=m
# CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_PHYSDEV is not set
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_ADDRTYPE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_REALM=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_SCTP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_COMMENT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_CONNMARK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_HASHLIMIT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REJECT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_LOG=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ULOG=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TCPMSS=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_NEEDED=y
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETMAP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_SAME=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_IRC=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_FTP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_TFTP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_NAT_AMANDA=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_MANGLE=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_TOS=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_ECN=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_DSCP=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MARK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_CLASSIFY=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_CONNMARK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_RAW=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NOTRACK=m
CONFIG_IP_NF_ARPTABLES=m
# CONFIG_IP_NF_ARPFILTER is not set
# CONFIG_IP_NF_ARP_MANGLE is not set
#
# Bridge: Netfilter Configuration
#
# CONFIG_BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES is not set
CONFIG_BRIDGE=m
CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q=m
# CONFIG_DECNET is not set
CONFIG_LLC=m
CONFIG_LLC2=m
CONFIG_IPX=m
CONFIG_IPX_INTERN=y
# CONFIG_ATALK is not set
# CONFIG_NET_SCHED is not set
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y
#
# Network testing
#
CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN=m
# CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
# CONFIG_IRDA is not set
# CONFIG_BT is not set
#
# Device Drivers
#
#
# Generic Driver Options
#
CONFIG_STANDALONE=y
CONFIG_PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD=y
# CONFIG_FW_LOADER is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER is not set
#
# Memory Technology Devices (MTD)
#
# CONFIG_MTD is not set
#
# Parallel port support
#
CONFIG_PARPORT=m
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=m
# CONFIG_PARPORT_SERIAL is not set
# CONFIG_PARPORT_GSC is not set
# CONFIG_PARPORT_1284 is not set
#
# Plug and Play support
#
CONFIG_PNP=y
# CONFIG_PNP_DEBUG is not set
#
# Protocols
#
#
# Block devices
#
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD is not set
# CONFIG_PARIDE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_CISS_DA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_COW_COMMON is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CRYPTOLOOP is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SX8 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_COUNT=16
CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=""
# CONFIG_LBD is not set
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD=m
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_BUFFERS=8
CONFIG_CDROM_PKTCDVD_WCACHE=y
#
# IO Schedulers
#
CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=m
CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=m
# CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
#
# ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support
#
CONFIG_IDE=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE=y
#
# Please see Documentation/ide.txt for help/info on IDE drives
#
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD_IDE is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDISK=y
CONFIG_IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE=y
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=m
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEFLOPPY is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDESCSI is not set
CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL=y
#
# IDE chipset support/bugfixes
#
CONFIG_IDE_GENERIC=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPNP is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEPCI=y
CONFIG_IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RZ1000 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_FORCED is not set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO=y
# CONFIG_IDEDMA_ONLYDISK is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AEC62XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD64X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRIFLEX is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CY82C693 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CS5530 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT34X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HPT366 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SC1200 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PIIX=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IT821X is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NS87415 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PDC202XX_NEW is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SVWKS is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIIMAGE is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIS5513 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SLC90E66 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_TRM290 is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX is not set
# CONFIG_IDE_ARM is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA=y
# CONFIG_IDEDMA_IVB is not set
CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD is not set
#
# SCSI device support
#
CONFIG_SCSI=y
CONFIG_SCSI_PROC_FS=y
#
# SCSI support type (disk, tape, CD-ROM)
#
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_ST is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_OSST is not set
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SR is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SG is not set
# CONFIG_CHR_DEV_SCH is not set
#
# Some SCSI devices (e.g. CD jukebox) support multiple LUNs
#
# CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_LOGGING is not set
#
# SCSI Transport Attributes
#
# CONFIG_SCSI_SPI_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_ISCSI_ATTRS is not set
#
# SCSI low-level drivers
#
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_3W_XXXX_RAID is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_3W_9XXX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_ACARD is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AACRAID is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX_OLD is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_AIC79XX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DPT_I2O is not set
# CONFIG_MEGARAID_NEWGEN is not set
# CONFIG_MEGARAID_LEGACY is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_SATA=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_SVW is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_ATA_PIIX=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_PROMISE is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_QSTOR is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_VITESSE is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_BUSLOGIC is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DMX3191D is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_EATA is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_FUTURE_DOMAIN is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_GDTH is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_IPS is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_INITIO is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_INIA100 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_PPA is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_IMM is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_2 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_IPR is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLOGIC_FC is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLOGIC_1280 is not set
CONFIG_SCSI_QLA2XXX=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA21XX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA22XX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA2300 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA2322 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA6312 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_QLA24XX is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_LPFC is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DC390T is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_NSP32 is not set
# CONFIG_SCSI_DEBUG is not set
#
# Multi-device support (RAID and LVM)
#
# CONFIG_MD is not set
#
# Fusion MPT device support
#
# CONFIG_FUSION is not set
# CONFIG_FUSION_SPI is not set
# CONFIG_FUSION_FC is not set
#
# IEEE 1394 (FireWire) support
#
# CONFIG_IEEE1394 is not set
#
# I2O device support
#
# CONFIG_I2O is not set
#
# Network device support
#
CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
# CONFIG_DUMMY is not set
# CONFIG_BONDING is not set
# CONFIG_EQUALIZER is not set
# CONFIG_TUN is not set
# CONFIG_NET_SB1000 is not set
#
# ARCnet devices
#
# CONFIG_ARCNET is not set
#
# Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit)
#
# CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET is not set
#
# Ethernet (1000 Mbit)
#
# CONFIG_ACENIC is not set
# CONFIG_DL2K is not set
# CONFIG_E1000 is not set
# CONFIG_NS83820 is not set
# CONFIG_HAMACHI is not set
# CONFIG_R8169 is not set
CONFIG_SK98LIN=m
# CONFIG_TIGON3 is not set
# CONFIG_BNX2 is not set
#
# Ethernet (10000 Mbit)
#
# CONFIG_IXGB is not set
# CONFIG_S2IO is not set
#
# Token Ring devices
#
# CONFIG_TR is not set
#
# Wireless LAN (non-hamradio)
#
# CONFIG_NET_RADIO is not set
#
# Wan interfaces
#
# CONFIG_WAN is not set
# CONFIG_FDDI is not set
# CONFIG_PLIP is not set
# CONFIG_PPP is not set
# CONFIG_SLIP is not set
# CONFIG_NET_FC is not set
# CONFIG_NETPOLL is not set
# CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER is not set
#
# ISDN subsystem
#
# CONFIG_ISDN is not set
#
# Telephony Support
#
# CONFIG_PHONE is not set
#
# Input device support
#
CONFIG_INPUT=y
#
# Userland interfaces
#
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX=y
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_X=1024
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_Y=768
# CONFIG_INPUT_JOYDEV is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_TSDEV is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_EVBUG is not set
#
# Input Device Drivers
#
CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y
CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD=y
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUNKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_LKKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_XTKBD is not set
# CONFIG_KEYBOARD_NEWTON is not set
CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSE=y
CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2=y
# CONFIG_MOUSE_SERIAL is not set
# CONFIG_MOUSE_VSXXXAA is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_TOUCHSCREEN is not set
# CONFIG_INPUT_MISC is not set
#
# Hardware I/O ports
#
CONFIG_SERIO=y
CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y
# CONFIG_SERIO_SERPORT is not set
# CONFIG_SERIO_CT82C710 is not set
# CONFIG_SERIO_PARKBD is not set
# CONFIG_SERIO_PCIPS2 is not set
CONFIG_SERIO_LIBPS2=y
# CONFIG_SERIO_RAW is not set
# CONFIG_GAMEPORT is not set
#
# Character devices
#
CONFIG_VT=y
CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_HW_CONSOLE=y
# CONFIG_SERIAL_NONSTANDARD is not set
#
# Serial drivers
#
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=m
# CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_ACPI is not set
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=4
# CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED is not set
#
# Non-8250 serial port support
#
CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE=m
# CONFIG_SERIAL_JSM is not set
CONFIG_UNIX98_PTYS=y
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=y
CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY_COUNT=256
# CONFIG_PRINTER is not set
# CONFIG_PPDEV is not set
# CONFIG_TIPAR is not set
#
# IPMI
#
# CONFIG_IPMI_HANDLER is not set
#
# Watchdog Cards
#
# CONFIG_WATCHDOG is not set
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM=m
CONFIG_NVRAM=m
CONFIG_RTC=m
CONFIG_GEN_RTC=m
CONFIG_GEN_RTC_X=y
# CONFIG_DTLK is not set
# CONFIG_R3964 is not set
# CONFIG_APPLICOM is not set
#
# Ftape, the floppy tape device driver
#
CONFIG_AGP=m
# CONFIG_AGP_ALI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_ATI is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_AMD64 is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_INTEL is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_NVIDIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_AGP_EFFICEON is not set
# CONFIG_DRM is not set
# CONFIG_MWAVE is not set
# CONFIG_RAW_DRIVER is not set
# CONFIG_HPET is not set
# CONFIG_HANGCHECK_TIMER is not set
#
# TPM devices
#
#
# I2C support
#
CONFIG_I2C=m
CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=m
#
# I2C Algorithms
#
# CONFIG_I2C_ALGOBIT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALGOPCF is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALGOPCA is not set
#
# I2C Hardware Bus support
#
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI1535 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_ALI15X3 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD756 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_AMD8111 is not set
CONFIG_I2C_I801=m
# CONFIG_I2C_I810 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4 is not set
CONFIG_I2C_ISA=m
# CONFIG_I2C_NFORCE2 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PROSAVAGE is not set
# CONFIG_SCx200_ACB is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS5595 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS630 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_SIS96X is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VIAPRO is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_VOODOO3 is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_PCA_ISA is not set
CONFIG_I2C_SENSOR=m
#
# Miscellaneous I2C Chip support
#
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS is not set
# CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
#
# Dallas's 1-wire bus
#
# CONFIG_W1 is not set
#
# Hardware Monitoring support
#
CONFIG_HWMON=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_GL518SM is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_IT87 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM83 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90 is not set
# CONFIG_SENSORS_VIA686A is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D=m
# CONFIG_HWMON_DEBUG_CHIP is not set
#
# Misc devices
#
#
# Multimedia devices
#
# CONFIG_VIDEO_DEV is not set
#
# Digital Video Broadcasting Devices
#
# CONFIG_DVB is not set
#
# Graphics support
#
# CONFIG_FB is not set
# CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT is not set
#
# Console display driver support
#
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y
#
# Sound
#
CONFIG_SOUND=m
#
# Advanced Linux Sound Architecture
#
CONFIG_SND=m
CONFIG_SND_TIMER=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM=m
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER=m
CONFIG_SND_SEQ_DUMMY=m
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y
CONFIG_SND_RTCTIMER=m
# CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK is not set
# CONFIG_SND_DEBUG is not set
#
# Generic devices
#
# CONFIG_SND_DUMMY is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIRMIDI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MTPAV is not set
# CONFIG_SND_SERIAL_U16550 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MPU401 is not set
#
# PCI devices
#
CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m
# CONFIG_SND_ALI5451 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ATIIXP_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8810 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8820 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_AU8830 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_BT87X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS46XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CS4281 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_EMU10K1X is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CA0106 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_KORG1212 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MIXART is not set
# CONFIG_SND_NM256 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME32 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME96 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_RME9652 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSP is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDSPM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_TRIDENT is not set
# CONFIG_SND_YMFPCI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ALS4000 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_CMIPCI is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1370 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ENS1371 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1938 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ES1968 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_MAESTRO3 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_FM801 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1712 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_ICE1724 is not set
CONFIG_SND_INTEL8X0=m
# CONFIG_SND_SONICVIBES is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VIA82XX_MODEM is not set
# CONFIG_SND_VX222 is not set
# CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set
#
# USB devices
#
# CONFIG_SND_USB_AUDIO is not set
# CONFIG_SND_USB_USX2Y is not set
#
# Open Sound System
#
# CONFIG_SOUND_PRIME is not set
#
# USB support
#
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD=y
CONFIG_USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI=y
CONFIG_USB=m
# CONFIG_USB_DEBUG is not set
#
# Miscellaneous USB options
#
CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS=y
#
# USB Host Controller Drivers
#
CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m
# CONFIG_USB_ISP116X_HCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD is not set
CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=m
# CONFIG_USB_SL811_HCD is not set
#
# USB Device Class drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_AUDIO is not set
# CONFIG_USB_BLUETOOTH_TTY is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MIDI is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ACM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_PRINTER is not set
#
# NOTE: USB_STORAGE enables SCSI, and 'SCSI disk support' may also be
needed; see USB_STORAGE Help for more information
#
# CONFIG_USB_STORAGE is not set
#
# USB Input Devices
#
# CONFIG_USB_HID is not set
#
# USB HID Boot Protocol drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_KBD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MOUSE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_AIPTEK is not set
# CONFIG_USB_WACOM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ACECAD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_KBTAB is not set
# CONFIG_USB_POWERMATE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MTOUCH is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ITMTOUCH is not set
# CONFIG_USB_EGALAX is not set
# CONFIG_USB_XPAD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_ATI_REMOTE is not set
#
# USB Imaging devices
#
# CONFIG_USB_MICROTEK is not set
#
# USB Multimedia devices
#
# CONFIG_USB_DABUSB is not set
#
# Video4Linux support is needed for USB Multimedia device support
#
#
# USB Network Adapters
#
# CONFIG_USB_KAWETH is not set
# CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS is not set
# CONFIG_USB_USBNET is not set
# CONFIG_USB_MON is not set
#
# USB port drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_USS720 is not set
#
# USB Serial Converter support
#
CONFIG_USB_SERIAL=m
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GENERIC is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_AIRPRIME is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_BELKIN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DIGI_ACCELEPORT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EMPEG is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_VISOR is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_IPAQ is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_EDGEPORT_TI is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_GARMIN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_PDA is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KOBIL_SCT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MCT_U232 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_PL2303 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_HP4X is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_TI is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_XIRCOM is not set
#
# USB Miscellaneous drivers
#
# CONFIG_USB_EMI62 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_EMI26 is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LCD is not set
# CONFIG_USB_LED is not set
# CONFIG_USB_CYTHERM is not set
# CONFIG_USB_PHIDGETKIT is not set
# CONFIG_USB_PHIDGETSERVO is not set
# CONFIG_USB_IDMOUSE is not set
# CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA is not set
#
# USB DSL modem support
#
#
# USB Gadget Support
#
# CONFIG_USB_GADGET is not set
#
# MMC/SD Card support
#
# CONFIG_MMC is not set
#
# InfiniBand support
#
# CONFIG_INFINIBAND is not set
#
# SN Devices
#
#
# File systems
#
CONFIG_EXT2_FS=m
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP=y
CONFIG_FS_XIP=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_JBD=y
# CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_FS_MBCACHE=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK is not set
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_JFS_FS=m
CONFIG_JFS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_JFS_SECURITY=y
# CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_JFS_STATISTICS=y
CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
#
# XFS support
#
CONFIG_XFS_FS=m
CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA=y
CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL=y
# CONFIG_MINIX_FS is not set
# CONFIG_ROMFS_FS is not set
CONFIG_INOTIFY=y
# CONFIG_QUOTA is not set
CONFIG_QUOTACTL=y
CONFIG_DNOTIFY=y
# CONFIG_AUTOFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AUTOFS4_FS is not set
#
# CD-ROM/DVD Filesystems
#
CONFIG_ISO9660_FS=m
CONFIG_JOLIET=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS=y
CONFIG_ZISOFS_FS=m
CONFIG_UDF_FS=m
CONFIG_UDF_NLS=y
#
# DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems
#
CONFIG_FAT_FS=m
CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=m
CONFIG_VFAT_FS=m
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE=437
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NTFS_FS=m
# CONFIG_NTFS_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_NTFS_RW=y
#
# Pseudo filesystems
#
CONFIG_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_PROC_KCORE=y
CONFIG_SYSFS=y
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_TMPFS=y
CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_TMPFS_SECURITY=y
# CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is not set
# CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set
CONFIG_RAMFS=y
#
# Miscellaneous filesystems
#
# CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_CRAMFS is not set
# CONFIG_VXFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HPFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_QNX4FS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_SYSV_FS is not set
# CONFIG_UFS_FS is not set
#
# Network File Systems
#
# CONFIG_NFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_NFSD is not set
# CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
# CONFIG_CIFS is not set
# CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set
# CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set
#
# Partition Types
#
# CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED is not set
CONFIG_MSDOS_PARTITION=y
#
# Native Language Support
#
CONFIG_NLS=m
CONFIG_NLS_DEFAULT="iso8859-1"
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437=m
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_737 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_775 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_850 is not set
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_852=m
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_855 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_857 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_860 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_861 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_862 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_863 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_864 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_865 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_866 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_869 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_936 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_950 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_932 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_949 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_874 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_8 is not set
CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1250=m
# CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_1251 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ASCII is not set
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_1=m
CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_2=m
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_3 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_4 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_5 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_6 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_7 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_9 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_13 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_14 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_ISO8859_15 is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_R is not set
# CONFIG_NLS_KOI8_U is not set
CONFIG_NLS_UTF8=m
#
# Kernel hacking
#
# CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=15
CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is not set
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y
# CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is not set
CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW=y
# CONFIG_KPROBES is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set
# CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set
CONFIG_4KSTACKS=y
CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG=y
CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y
#
# Security options
#
CONFIG_KEYS=y
CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS=y
CONFIG_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=m
CONFIG_SECURITY_ROOTPLUG=m
CONFIG_SECURITY_SECLVL=m
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1
# CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE is not set
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_AVC_STATS=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE=1
#
# Cryptographic options
#
CONFIG_CRYPTO=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HMAC=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_NULL=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MD5=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA1=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA256=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SHA512=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_WP512=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TGR192=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DES=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_BLOWFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TWOFISH=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_SERPENT=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_586=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST5=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CAST6=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARC4=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_KHAZAD=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ANUBIS=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_MICHAEL_MIC=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32C=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST=m
#
# Hardware crypto devices
#
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_PADLOCK is not set
#
# Library routines
#
CONFIG_CRC_CCITT=m
CONFIG_CRC32=m
CONFIG_LIBCRC32C=m
CONFIG_ZLIB_INFLATE=m
CONFIG_ZLIB_DEFLATE=m
CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE=y
CONFIG_X86_SMP=y
CONFIG_X86_HT=y
CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=y
CONFIG_X86_TRAMPOLINE=y
CONFIG_PC=y
.-----------------------------------------.
| OO RRR TTT OOPS Reporting Tool v.b4 |
| O O R R T www.wsi.edu.pl/ |
| O O RRR T /~piotrowskim/files/ |
| OO R R T /ort/beta/ |
'-----------------------------------------'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread