From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751339AbVHQXze (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:55:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751341AbVHQXzd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:55:33 -0400 Received: from mail23.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.164]:26052 "EHLO mail23.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751339AbVHQXzd (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:55:33 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Peter Williams Subject: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:45:50 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Michal Piotrowski , LKML References: <43001E18.8020707@bigpond.net.au> <200508180916.08454.kernel@kolivas.org> <4303CCB9.6000403@bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: <4303CCB9.6000403@bigpond.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508180945.50185.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:48 am, Peter Williams wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:15 am, Peter Williams wrote: > >>Con Kolivas wrote: > > He did a make allyesconfig which is a bit different and probably far too > > i/o bound. By the way a single kernel compile is hardly a reproducible > > benchmark. Ideally he should be using my 'kernbench' benchmark (hint > > hint). > > Is that what I meant when I said "contest"? I wasn't sure that I used > the right name. No, they're different things. Kernbench is a script to do the kernbench measurement as used by M. Bligh. It's one of my family of benchmarks ;) http://contest.kolivas.org http://kernbench.kolivas.org http://interbench.kolivas.org Cheers, Con