From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965011AbVHSQaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:30:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965015AbVHSQaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:30:20 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:16779 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965011AbVHSQaT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:30:19 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: David Howells Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Rename PageChecked as PageMiscFS Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 02:31:18 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins References: <20050818222721.GC4275@elf.ucw.cz> <7489.1124375598@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <8880.1124445882@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8880.1124445882@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508200231.19341.phillips@istop.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 19 August 2005 20:04, David Howells wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I disagree again. I don't think PageFsMisc() is particularly ugly or > > > unreadable; and it makes it a touch more likely that someone reading > > > code that uses it will notice that it's a miscellaneous flag > > > specifically for filesystem use (you can't rely on them going and > > > looking in the header file for a comment). > > > > Well, is it PageFsMisc or PageFSMisc? Subject gets second variant, and > > I like it better, too. (That does not mean I like it). > > The Subject wasn't set by me. Somehow the PageFsMisc variant looks better > to me, but I could just be biased. Biased. Fs is a mixed case acronym, nuff said. Regards, Daniel