From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751239AbVHTK5F (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:57:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932218AbVHTK5F (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:57:05 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:30983 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751239AbVHTK5C (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:57:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:56:55 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] docs: fix misinformation about overcommit_memory Message-ID: <20050820105654.GO3615@stusta.de> References: <200508192318_MC3-1-A7AE-1D7A@compuserve.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508192318_MC3-1-A7AE-1D7A@compuserve.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:14:39PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Someone complained about the docs for vm_overcommit_memory being wrong. > This patch copies the text from the vm documentation into procfs. > Please apply. >... Do we really need two copies of the same text? Couldn't you instead write some kind of "please look at Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting"? > Chuck cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed