From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750756AbVHUBru (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:47:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750760AbVHUBru (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:47:50 -0400 Received: from mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.192]:32138 "EHLO mail11.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbVHUBrt (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:47:49 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Michal Piotrowski Subject: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:47:39 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: LKML References: <43001E18.8020707@bigpond.net.au> <6bffcb0e05081614498879a72@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e05082018346f073ca4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e05082018346f073ca4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508211147.39503.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, Hi > here are kernbench results: Nice to see you using kernbench :) > ./kernbench -M -o 128 > [..] > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run: Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not sure what 128 represents. Cheers, Con