From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751103AbVHVUiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:38:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751105AbVHVUiD (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:38:03 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:26642 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751103AbVHVUiC (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:38:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:38:00 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Chris Wright Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] SECURITY must depend on SYSFS Message-ID: <20050822203800.GH9927@stusta.de> References: <20050822162050.GC9927@stusta.de> <20050822173003.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050822173003.GS7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:30:03AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) wrote: > > config SECURITY > > bool "Enable different security models" > > + depends on SYSFS > > Hmm, what about select instead? I have no strong opinion on this, especially since this is only an issue in the COMFIG_EMBEDDED=y case. > thanks, > -chris cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed