From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jasonuhl@sgi.com
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME woes
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:18:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050823071842.GB29951@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050821021322.3986dd4a.akpm@osdl.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> [050821 02:15]:
> "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > It has been pointed out to me that ia64 doesn't boot
> > with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y. The issue is the call to
> > sched_clock() ... which on ia64 accesses some per-cpu
> > data to adjust for possible variations in processor
> > speed between different cpus. Since the per-cpu page
> > is not set up for the first few printk() calls, we die.
> >
> > Is this an issue on any other architecture? Most versions
> > of sched_clock() seem to just scale jiffies into nanoseconds,
> > so I guess they don't. s390, sparc64, x86 and x86_64 all
> > have more sophisticated versions but they don't appear to me
> > to have limitations on how early they might be called.
CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME also has a problem on at least ARM OMAP where
the IO mapping to read the clock may not be initialized when
sched_clock() is called for the first time.
I'd hate to have to test for something for CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME
every time sched_clock() is being called.
The quick fix would seem to be to only allow CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME
from kernel cmdline to make it happen a bit later. So basically
make int printk_time = 0 until command line is evaluated.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-18 18:47 CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME woes Luck, Tony
2005-08-21 9:13 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-21 9:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-21 9:27 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-21 9:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-21 11:25 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-21 18:01 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-24 0:04 ` Tim Bird
2005-08-22 17:42 ` tony.luck
2005-08-22 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22 20:52 ` tony.luck
2005-08-22 20:20 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-22 20:33 ` Jason Uhlenkott
2005-08-22 20:42 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-22 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22 22:33 ` tony.luck
2005-08-22 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-22 23:27 ` tony.luck
2005-08-23 1:52 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-08-23 15:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-22 21:10 ` tony.luck
2005-08-24 0:36 ` Tim Bird
2005-08-23 7:18 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-23 14:07 Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050823071842.GB29951@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jasonuhl@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox