public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux AIO status & todo
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:56:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050823095609.GZ7403@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050823074438.GA4586@in.ibm.com>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:14:38PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:

> 	2. No support for propagating IO completion events to user space
> 	   threads using RT signals. User threads need to poll the completion
> 	   queue using io_getevents. POSIX specifies that when an AIO
> 	   request completes, a signal can be delivered to the application
> 	   to indicate the completion of the IO.

POSIX AIO needs to handle SIGEV_NONE, SIGEV_SIGNAL and SIGEV_THREAD
notification.  Obviously kernel shouldn't create threads for SIGEV_THREAD
itself, as kernel shouldn't hardcode all the implementation details how a
thread can be created.  But it would be good if AIO signalling e.g. handled
both SIGEV_SIGNAL and SIGEV_SIGNAL | SIGEV_THREAD_ID, with the same usage as
e.g. timer_* syscalls.  If kernel makes sure SI_ASYNCIO si_code is set in
the notification signal siginfos, glibc could even use just one helper
thread for timer_*/[al]io_* and maybe in the future other SIGEV_THREAD notification.

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-23  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-23  7:44 Linux AIO status & todo Suparna Bhattacharya
2005-08-23  9:56 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2005-08-23 13:13   ` Laurent Vivier
2005-08-23 16:57   ` Benjamin LaHaise

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050823095609.GZ7403@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox