public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk queue io tracing support
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:25:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050824072501.GA27992@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050824171931.H4209301@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>

On Wed, Aug 24 2005, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:08:10AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > ...
> > This isn't msec precision, it's usec. sched_clock() is in ns! I already
> > decided that msec is too coarse, but usec _should_ be enough.
> 
> Right you are (I was thinking m-for-micro, not m-for-milli in my head ;)
> - but still, there doesn't seem to be any reason for that divide-by-1000
> and reducing the precision in the kernel rather than in userspace, does
> there?  Doing it the other way means you wont ever have to worry about
> whether it is/isn't sufficient precision for all possible block devices,
> and the precision the tool displays will just be a userspace decision.

I was just worried about wrapping of ->time, but I did make it a 64-bit
unit. So I guess we could go to nsec granularity, there should be plenty
[*] of space. I'll change that too, I'll post an update version later.

* I probably should not make such a statement :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-24  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-23 12:32 [PATCH] blk queue io tracing support Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  1:03 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:08   ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  7:19     ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:25       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-08-24  9:28         ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-29  4:53           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-29  5:57             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-30 23:43           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  7:31             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-30 23:48           ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-30 23:58             ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:19               ` Tom Zanussi
2005-08-31  4:33                 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:53                   ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-31  4:55                   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-08-31  7:33             ` Jens Axboe
2005-09-02 11:20             ` Jens Axboe
2005-08-24  6:24 ` Nathan Scott
2005-08-24  7:08   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050824072501.GA27992@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathans@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox