From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750785AbVHXKyp (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:54:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750799AbVHXKyp (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:54:45 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:11793 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750785AbVHXKyo (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 06:54:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:54:42 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] #include in interrupt.h Message-ID: <20050824105442.GJ5603@stusta.de> References: <20050824085750.GG5603@stusta.de> <20050824092250.GA26726@infradead.org> <20050824100857.GH5603@stusta.de> <1124880295.20120.44.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1124880295.20120.44.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:44:55AM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:08 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Looking at 2.6.13-rc6-mm2, the only architectures with own enable_irq() > > implementations are m68knommu and sparc. > > You missed ARM. Yes and no. Yes, because you are right that I missed architectures. No, because I was only looking at what would be required to unconditionally offer the enable_irq() prototyp in interrupt.h . > tglx cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed