* Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
[not found] <200508240401.j7O41qlB029277@hera.kernel.org>
@ 2005-08-24 19:06 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-24 19:13 ` Paul Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2005-08-24 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: torvalds, pj
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:01:52PM -0700, Linux Kernel wrote:
> tree c81c261274011d301dfbcfd1a3e13480b93c167e
> parent ae75784bc576a1af70509c2f3ba2b70bb65a0c58
> author Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:04:27 -0700
> committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:02:52 -0700
>
> [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
This broke ppc64 for me.
kernel/cpuset.c: In function 'update_cpu_domains':
kernel/cpuset.c:648: error: invalid lvalue in unary '&'
kernel/cpuset.c:648: error: invalid lvalue in unary '&'
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
2005-08-24 19:06 ` [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix Dave Jones
@ 2005-08-24 19:13 ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 20:21 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jackson @ 2005-08-24 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds
Dave wrote:
> > [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
>
> This broke ppc64 for me.
Thanks to Paul Mackerras's report, I sent a patch for this a few hours ago:
[PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix
It just makes a local copy of the cpumask_t in a local variable on the stack.
I'm still a couple of hours from actually verifying that ppc64 builds with
this - due to unrelated confusions on my end. Perhaps you or Mackerras will
report in first, to verify if this patch works as advertised.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
2005-08-24 19:13 ` Paul Jackson
@ 2005-08-24 20:21 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-24 21:07 ` Paul Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2005-08-24 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Jackson; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:13:40PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I'm still a couple of hours from actually verifying that ppc64 builds with
> this - due to unrelated confusions on my end. Perhaps you or Mackerras will
> report in first, to verify if this patch works as advertised.
It does build, but I'm unable to boot test it.
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix
2005-08-24 20:21 ` Dave Jones
@ 2005-08-24 21:07 ` Paul Jackson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jackson @ 2005-08-24 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Jones; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds
Dave wrote:
> It does build, but I'm unable to boot test it.
Ok - thanks.
Looks like Nick might be leaning toward the simpler path of disabling
this feature (defining dynamic sched domains using exclusive cpusets)
for 2.6.13, or some such.
We'll see.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-24 21:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200508240401.j7O41qlB029277@hera.kernel.org>
2005-08-24 19:06 ` [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix Dave Jones
2005-08-24 19:13 ` Paul Jackson
2005-08-24 20:21 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-24 21:07 ` Paul Jackson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox