From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932250AbVHXVVz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:21:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932251AbVHXVVz (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:21:55 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45017 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932250AbVHXVVy (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:21:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Memory problem w/ recent kernels on 2x Opteron with 12 GB RAM Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:21:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: LKML , discuss@x86-64.org References: <200508242308.55433.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200508242308.55433.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508242321.48367.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 August 2005 23:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently seeing a memory problem on a NUMA-enabled dual-Opteron 250 > box with the 2.6.12.5 and 2.6.13-rc* (up to 7) kernels. Namely, the box > has 12 GB of RAM, 8 GB of which is installed on the first node. The whole > memory is detected but then only the first 8 GB of it is made available > (minus some hardware-related holes), as though the memory on the second > node were discarded for some reason. Boot log please? -Andi