From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@freescale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Remove asm/segment.h from low hanging architectures
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:34:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050825093424.GA10409@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430D8E68.7070303@vmware.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 02:24:56AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Yes, agree totally, i386 _requires_ asm/segment.h. It is used in
> low-level trap handling and bootup code from assembly files. In
> addition,
but keeping the header under that name will just encorage people
to put it back into drivers, after all it compiles on i386..
Let's rename it even for i386.
>even parts of userspace on i386 depend on asm/segment.h,
> although that is a different beast.
That's a problem of glibc-kernheaders (or insert alternative $name here)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-25 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-24 16:43 [PATCH 00/15] Remove asm/segment.h from low hanging architectures Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:47 ` [PATCH 01/15] alpha: remove use of asm/segment.h Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] arm26: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:50 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:52 ` [PATCH 04/15] cris: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:53 ` [PATCH 05/15] ia64: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 20:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2005-08-24 22:49 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-08-24 16:54 ` [PATCH 06/15] mips: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 17:02 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-08-24 16:55 ` [PATCH 07/15] parisc: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 17:14 ` [parisc-linux] " Matthew Wilcox
2005-08-24 17:31 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 08/15] ppc32: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:56 ` [PATCH 09/15] ppc64: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:58 ` [PATCH 10/15] s390: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:59 ` [PATCH 11/15] sh64: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 16:59 ` [PATCH 12/15] sh: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 17:00 ` [PATCH 13/15] sparc64: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 17:01 ` [PATCH 14/15] sparc: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-25 23:19 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-24 17:02 ` [PATCH 15/15] xtensa: " Kumar Gala
2005-08-24 21:50 ` [PATCH 00/15] Remove asm/segment.h from low hanging architectures Alan Cox
2005-08-24 21:35 ` Kumar Gala
2005-08-25 9:24 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-08-25 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050825093424.GA10409@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=galak@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox