From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: serue@us.ibm.com
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
linux-security-module@wirex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:41:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050826164139.GK7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050826092306.GA429@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
* serue@us.ibm.com (serue@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> Here are some numbers on a 4way x86 - PIII 700Mhz with 1G memory (hmm,
> highmem not enabled). I should hopefully have a 2way ppc available
> later today for a pair of runs.
Thanks for running these numbers Serge.
> dbench and tbench were run 50 times each, kernbench and reaim 10 times
> each. Results are mean +/- 95% confidence half-interval. Kernel had
> selinux and capabilities compiled in.
>
> A little surprising: kernbench is improved, but dbench and tbench
> are worse - though within the 95% CI.
It is interesting. Would be good to see what happens with the cap_ bits
used in SELinux instead of secondary callout. Also, need to run ia64,
do you have an ia64 box?
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-26 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-25 1:20 [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] Use capabilities as default w/ and w/out CONFIG_SECURITY Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] Rework stubs in security.h Chris Wright
2005-08-26 17:31 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-26 17:59 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 18:03 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-26 18:00 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-26 18:08 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 18:11 ` Tony Jones
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] Call security hooks conditionally if the security_op is filled out Chris Wright
2005-08-25 8:50 ` Kurt Garloff
2005-08-25 16:24 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] Remove unnecessary default capability callbacks Chris Wright
2005-08-25 1:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] Remove unnecesary capability hooks in rootplug Chris Wright
2005-08-25 14:38 ` serue
2005-08-25 15:13 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-25 16:21 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 16:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-25 17:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 21:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 16:28 ` serue
2005-08-25 21:12 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-31 6:34 ` Greg KH
2005-08-31 15:09 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 4:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates James Morris
2005-08-25 5:32 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 19:15 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-26 9:23 ` serue
2005-08-26 13:27 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-08-26 10:30 ` serue
2005-08-26 16:41 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-08-26 17:35 ` serue
2005-08-26 17:49 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-25 9:52 ` serue
2005-08-25 10:18 ` serue
2005-08-25 16:19 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050826164139.GK7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox