Re: [PATCH 0/5] LSM hook updates

James Morris
2005-08-25T04:39:54Z

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:

> This is based on Kurt's original work. The net effect is that
> LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities
> provide the defaults. I've done some basic performance testing, and
> found nothing surprising.

Do you mean nothing noticable?

> I'm interested to see numbers from others
> before I push this up. These are against Linus' current git tree (they
> will clash with the -mm tree).

Are there any numbers for popular architectures like i386 and x86_64?

- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>