From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@linux.intel.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: danial_thom@yahoo.com, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:10:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050826191026.GA8023@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430DF7FF.9080502@candelatech.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:55:27AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> Of course. Never found a motherboard yet with decent built-in
> NICs. The built-ins on this board are tg3 and they must be on
> a slow bus, because they cannot go faster than about 700Mbps
> (using big pkts).
There should be a number of decent boards out on the market these days.
Try picking up one with a CSA gige adapter (a dedicated high bandwidth
link to an e1000) or PCI Express (although that is harder to pick up on
from the specifications of most motherboards).
-ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-26 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-21 16:57 2.6.12 Performance problems Danial Thom
2005-08-23 7:12 ` Helge Hafting
2005-08-23 17:10 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 17:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-24 16:24 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-24 16:35 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-24 17:26 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 4:51 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 6:08 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 6:15 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-26 3:29 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 22:18 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 6:34 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 14:26 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-25 16:55 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-25 20:45 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 19:10 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2005-08-27 11:19 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2005-08-27 14:35 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 18:02 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-08-23 20:10 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 20:22 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2005-08-24 16:33 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 20:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-23 23:29 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-24 16:39 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-23 21:32 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-24 17:03 ` Danial Thom
[not found] <2230.192.167.206.189.1124721719.squirrel@new.host.name>
2005-08-22 15:41 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 13:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 15:34 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 16:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 17:06 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 18:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-08-26 21:09 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-26 23:27 ` Ben Greear
2005-08-27 14:44 ` Danial Thom
[not found] <9a87484905082111205d27c1aa@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-21 20:21 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-21 21:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-22 11:46 ` Denis Vlasenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-21 17:07 Danial Thom
2005-08-21 15:46 Danial Thom
2005-08-21 16:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-21 16:18 ` Danial Thom
2005-08-21 16:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-08-21 19:47 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050826191026.GA8023@linux.intel.com \
--to=bcrl@linux.intel.com \
--cc=danial_thom@yahoo.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox