From: Kent Robotti <dwilson24@nyc.rr.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Initramfs and TMPFS!
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:45:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050827224555.GA1731@Linux.nyc.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050827212817.GA2951@taniwha.stupidest.org>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:28:17PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> How about you do a little research on some things for a bit? The
> initramfs code is done the way it is for a good reason. cpio is used
> over tar for another good reason.
Why don't you do some research on manners?
> You are most welcome to disagree and even voice you disagreement, but
> there comes a point where you really need to produce some better
> arguments. Patches wouldn't hurt either.
Are you satisfied ass?????
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-27 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-27 8:19 Initramfs and TMPFS! Kent Robotti
2005-08-27 21:28 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-27 21:42 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-27 22:45 ` Kent Robotti [this message]
2005-08-27 22:42 ` David Weinehall
2005-08-27 22:57 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-08-27 23:38 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-27 23:41 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-08-28 0:21 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-08-28 5:36 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-03 8:29 Chuck Ebbert
[not found] <4Fuuy-6df-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4FJMZ-1YX-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-08-26 15:49 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-08-26 6:09 Kent Robotti
2005-08-26 1:39 dwilson24
2005-08-26 19:06 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-26 20:08 ` Kent Robotti
2005-08-26 20:22 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-26 21:34 ` Kent Robotti
[not found] ` <20050826211231.GA957@Linux.nyc.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20050827004045.GA17686@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2005-08-27 3:21 ` Kent Robotti
2005-08-27 4:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 19:32 dwilson24
2005-08-25 19:05 Alan Jenkins
2005-08-26 10:37 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 19:08 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 18:23 robotti
2005-08-25 18:15 robotti
2005-08-25 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2005-08-26 10:29 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-25 15:38 robotti
2005-08-25 16:00 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 19:10 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 15:34 robotti
2005-08-25 15:54 ` Erik Mouw
2005-08-26 15:03 ` Horst von Brand
2005-08-25 4:35 robotti
2005-08-25 13:49 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-25 4:32 robotti
2005-08-25 13:47 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 22:41 robotti
2005-08-25 3:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 3:15 robotti
2005-08-23 22:05 robotti
2005-08-24 2:57 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-24 20:52 ` Wakko Warner
2005-08-24 20:59 ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-08-23 21:16 robotti
2005-08-23 21:24 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-08-25 3:14 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050827224555.GA1731@Linux.nyc.rr.com \
--to=dwilson24@nyc.rr.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox