From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Mateusz Berezecki <mateuszb@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 context switching and posix threads performance question
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:09:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508272309.48320.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125147489.7756.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:58, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > I'm asking for some kind of an authoritative answer
> > quite urgently. What is the optimum thread amount on 2 CPU SMP system
> > running Linux ?
>
> context switching in linux isn't THAT expensive compared to some other
> operating systems, but it's not free either.
> The optimum is obviously 2 threads, one for each cpu that processes your
> network service in a state machine like way. This is why thttpd beats
> apache by 10x if not more.
On a current model processor (P4 3Ghz) the current 2.6 kernel can do about
700,000 context switches per second with processes if they do nothing but
switch, and perhaps slightly faster with threads. Each context switch,
therefore, is quite cheap to perform. However you're unlikely to perform more
than 10,000 context switches per second with real workloads and the switch
itself contributes a measurable, but not performance limiting, impact. The
more cpu bound your threads are the less context switches you'll perform.
Fork is quite a bit more expensive. I don't have current figures on fork, but
if you only fork once it shouldn't be a problem.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-27 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-27 12:11 Linux 2.6 context switching and posix threads performance question Mateusz Berezecki
2005-08-27 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <aec8d6fc050827053047b1b667@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-27 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-08-27 12:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-27 13:09 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-27 14:43 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-28 23:20 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-08-30 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508272309.48320.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mateuszb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox