From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751043AbVH2UzG (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:55:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751133AbVH2UzG (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:55:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:24497 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751043AbVH2UzF (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:55:05 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:54:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org References: <20050829200916.GI3716@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20050829200916.GI3716@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508292254.53476.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 29 August 2005 22:09, John W. Linville wrote: > Implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device}, based on curent > implementations of dma_sync_single_for_{cpu,device}. Hmm, who or what needs that? It doesn't seem to be documented in Documentation/DMA* and I also don't remember seeing any discussion of it. If it's commonly used it might better to add new swiotlb_* functions that only copy the requested range. -Andi