From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
discuss@x86-64.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com
Subject: [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_single_* implementations
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:33:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050830183337.GF18998@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830180912.GE18998@tuxdriver.com>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:09:14PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:03:35AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >
> > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev,
> > >+swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev,
> >
> > Huh? These look identical ... same args, same code, just a
> > different name.
>
> Have you looked at the implementations for swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu
> and swiotlb_sync_single_for_device? Those are already identical.
How about a patch like this? Just for comment...I'll repost if people
want it...
John
P.S. This is meant to apply on top of my previous swiotlb patch...
--- linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c.orig 2005-08-30 14:19:32.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-8_29_2005/arch/ia64/lib/swiotlb.c 2005-08-30 14:23:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -493,11 +493,11 @@ swiotlb_unmap_single(struct device *hwde
* address back to the card, you must first perform a
* swiotlb_dma_sync_for_device, and then the device again owns the buffer
*/
-void
-swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, int dir)
+static inline void
+swiotlb_sync_single_range(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
+ char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
if (dir == DMA_NONE)
BUG();
@@ -508,17 +508,17 @@ swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct devic
}
void
+swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
+ size_t size, int dir)
+{
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, 0, size, dir);
+}
+
+void
swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr);
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, 0, size, dir);
}
/*
@@ -528,28 +528,14 @@ void
swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, offset, size, dir);
}
void
swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, int dir)
{
- char *dma_addr = phys_to_virt(dev_addr) + offset;
-
- if (dir == DMA_NONE)
- BUG();
- if (dma_addr >= io_tlb_start && dma_addr < io_tlb_end)
- sync_single(hwdev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- else if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
- mark_clean(dma_addr, size);
+ swiotlb_sync_single_range(hwdev, dev_addr, offset, size, dir);
}
/*
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-30 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 18:03 [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: add swiotlb_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} Luck, Tony
2005-08-30 18:09 ` John W. Linville
2005-08-30 18:33 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2005-08-30 18:40 ` [rfc patch] swiotlb: consolidate swiotlb_sync_sg_* implementations John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 0/6] swiotlb maintenance and x86_64 dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 1/6] swiotlb: move from arch/ia64/lib to lib John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 2/6] swiotlb: cleanup some code duplication cruft John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 3/6] swiotlb: support syncing sub-ranges of mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 5/6] swiotlb: file header comments John W. Linville
2005-09-12 14:48 ` [patch 2.6.13 6/6] x86_64: implement dma_sync_single_range_for_{cpu,device} John W. Linville
2005-09-12 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:51 ` [patch 2.6.13 4/6] swiotlb: support syncing DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL mappings Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 19:51 ` John W. Linville
2005-09-12 19:53 ` [patch 2.6.13] swiotlb: BUG() for DMA_NONE in sync_single John W. Linville
2005-09-12 20:23 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-12 23:45 ` [patch 2.6.13 (take #2)] " John W. Linville
2005-09-12 23:59 ` Grant Grundler
2005-09-13 4:05 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050830183337.GF18998@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=Asit.K.Mallick@intel.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox