Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs

Daniel Phillips
2005-08-30T23:51:11Z

On Wednesday 31 August 2005 09:34, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:28:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Sure, but all that copying-and-pasting really sucks. I'm sure there's
> > some way of providing the slightly different semantics from the same
> > codebase?
>
> Careful - you've almost reinvented the concept of library, which would
> violate any number of patents...

I will keep my eyes open for library candidates as I go. For example, the
binary blob operations really cry out for it.

Regards,

Daniel