Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs

Greg KH
2005-09-08T01:11:19Z

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:54:45PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> Finally, assuming that the sysfs_dirent/configfs_dirent
> arrangement is pretty fleshed out, I think that perhaps this backing
> store could be joined. Again, no more magic could be added, and it
> would have to handle the sysfs and configfs types in concurrence, but I
> think it could be done. Again, sysfs folks, please comment.

Thanks for the good explainations. I still agree with Joel that these
need to be separate fses.

thanks,

greg k-h