From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751451AbVH3XvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:51:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751427AbVH3XvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:51:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:65478 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbVH3XvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:51:11 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:51:06 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Andrew Morton , Joel Becker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com References: <200508310854.40482.phillips@istop.com> <20050830162846.5f6d0a53.akpm@osdl.org> <20050830233440.GA26264@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050830233440.GA26264@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508310951.07112.phillips@istop.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 31 August 2005 09:34, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:28:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Sure, but all that copying-and-pasting really sucks. I'm sure there's > > some way of providing the slightly different semantics from the same > > codebase? > > Careful - you've almost reinvented the concept of library, which would > violate any number of patents... I will keep my eyes open for library candidates as I go. For example, the binary blob operations really cry out for it. Regards, Daniel