From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Sven Ladegast <sven@linux4geeks.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KLive: Linux Kernel Live Usage Monitor
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:20:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050831182050.GC703@openzaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050830145602.GN8515@g5.random>
Hi!
> > [..] combined
> > with an automatic oops/panic/bug-report this would be _very_ useful I think.
>
> That would be nice addition IMHO. It'll be more complex since it'll
> involve netconsole dumping and passing the klive session to the kernel
> somehow (userland would be too unreliable to push the oops to the
> server). The worst part is that oops dumping might expose random kernel
> data (it could contain ssh keys as well), so I would either need to
> purify the stack/code/register lines making the oops quite useless, or
> not to show it at all (and only to show the count of the oopses
> publically). A parameter could be used to tell the kernel if the whole
> oops should be sent to the klive server or if only the notification an
> oops should be sent (without sending the payload with potentially
> sensitive data inside).
Well, you could remove everything that is not valid kernel text from backtrace.
That should make ssh keys non-issue and still provide usefull information.
Oh and you probably want to somehow identify modified kernels.
Otherwise if I do some development on 2.3.4-foo5, you'll get many oopsen
caused by my development code... it is getting complex.
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-30 3:09 KLive: Linux Kernel Live Usage Monitor Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 8:01 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-08-30 8:29 ` Rogier Wolff
2005-08-30 8:53 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-08-30 9:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2005-08-30 9:54 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-08-30 15:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 16:33 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-30 16:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 16:56 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-30 16:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-31 18:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-01 15:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 16:36 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-30 22:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-31 1:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-31 19:14 ` tony.luck
2005-08-31 19:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-09-05 18:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 14:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 14:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-30 22:43 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-08-30 23:25 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-30 23:19 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-08-31 13:34 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-31 14:28 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-08-31 21:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-30 14:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-08-31 18:20 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-09-01 15:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-09-01 12:26 ` Sven Ladegast
2005-09-05 22:05 ` Marc Giger
2005-09-05 23:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-30 17:08 Wilkerson, Bryan P
2005-08-30 17:44 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-08-30 20:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050831182050.GC703@openzaurus.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sven@linux4geeks.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox