From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
ananth@in.ibm.com, prasanna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]kprobes fix bug when probed on task and isr functions
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 14:09:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050901140938.69909683.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050901134937.A29041@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a race condition where in system used to hang
> or sometime crash within minutes when kprobes are inserted on
> ISR routine and a task routine.
It's desirable that the patch descriptions tell us _how_ a bug was fixed,
as well as what the bug was. It means that people don't have to ask
questions like:
> void __kprobes lock_kprobes(void)
> {
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> spin_lock(&kprobe_lock);
> kprobe_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
what is this change trying to do? If a lock is taken from both process and
irq contexts then local IRQs must be disabled for the entire period when the
lock is held, not just for a little blip like this. If IRQ-context code is
running this function then the code is deadlockable.
Now, probably there's deep magic happening here and I'm wrong. If so then
please explain the code's magic via a comment patch so the question doesn't
arise again, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 20:49 [PATCH]kprobes fix bug when probed on task and isr functions Keshavamurthy Anil S
2005-09-01 21:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-09-01 21:27 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2005-09-01 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-01 22:18 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S
2005-09-01 23:12 ` [PATCH]kprobes comment patch around kprobes lock functions Keshavamurthy Anil S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050901140938.69909683.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox