From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:49:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050901144956.GB83@DervishD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4316EAD1.70300@ens-lyon.org>
Salut Brice :)
* Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> dixit:
> Le 01.09.2005 13:36, DervishD a écrit :
> > The lack of speed seems to affect only the OHCI driver. My test
> > was done over a PCI USB 2.0 card, ALi chipset, OHCI driver (well
> > EHCI+OHCI) and using a full speed device capable of 12MBps. The
> > average measured speeds are:
> >
> > - 2.4.31: about 450Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.11-Debian: about 800Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.11.12: about 820Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.12.x: about 200Kb/seg
> > - 2.6.13: about 200Kb/seg
> Are you mounting this storage with vfat and 'sync' option ?
Yes, that may be the problem, but I think that is not the only
problem, see below.
> IIRC, sync support for vfat was added around 2.6.12, making
> write way slower since it's now really synchron.
The fact is that if I mount the device under 2.4.31 using the
'sync' option, the speed are the ones shown above, but if I mount
them with 'async', the speed is that of the light ;) I mean, the
'sync' option is doing something even in 2.4.31. The same applies to
2.6.11, but I have to test in 2.6.12 & 13.
Thanks for your help. If the problem is just that, the sync
option, I'll drop a note to the mailing list. Merci mille fois ;)
Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado
--
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-01 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 11:36 USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12 DervishD
2005-09-01 11:49 ` Brice Goglin
2005-09-01 14:49 ` DervishD [this message]
2005-09-01 16:23 ` [SOLVED] " DervishD
2005-09-01 16:31 ` Mark Lord
2005-09-01 17:29 ` DervishD
2005-09-01 12:29 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-01 20:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-09-01 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050901144956.GB83@DervishD \
--to=lkml@dervishd.net \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox