Re: [discuss] [2.6 patch] include/asm-x86_64 "extern inline" -> "static inline"

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:47:40PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:00:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > It isn't the same, but "static inline" is the correct variant.
> > 
> > "extern inline __attribute__((always_inline))" (which is what
> > "extern inline" is expanded to) doesn't make sense.
> 
> It does make sense and is different from
> static inline __attribute__((always_inline)).
> Try:
> static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foo (void) {}
> void (*fn)(void) = foo;
> vs.
> extern inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foo (void) {}
> void (*fn)(void) = foo;
> In the former case, GCC will emit the out of line static copy of foo
> if you take its address, in the latter case either you provide foo
> function by other means, or you get linker error.

And we need the former case because in the kernel we do not have 
out-of-line variants of the inline functions.

> 	Jakub

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed