From: "'hch@lst.de'" <hch@lst.de>
To: "Bagalkote, Sreenivas" <sreenib@lsil.com>
Cc: "'hch@lst.de'" <hch@lst.de>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"'Matt_Domsch@Dell.com'" <Matt_Domsch@Dell.com>,
"Patro, Sumant" <sumantp@COS1.co.lsil.com>,
"Kolli, Neela Syam" <knsyam@lsil.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH scsi-misc 2/2] megaraid_sas: LSI Logic MegaR AID SAS RA ID D river]
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050906133033.GA30721@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57060CD126@exa-atlanta>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:34:07PM -0400, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote:
> > - the ->queuecommand cleanup patch I sent you a awhile ago doesn't
> > seem to be applied
>
> I seem to have missed it. I will submit the patch after inclusion
ok, this is really just a small cleanup anyway.
> > - there's quite a lot of slightly odd formating, it would be nice
> > if you could run the code through scripts/Lindent.
>
> I ran Lindent. It looks worse :( I am submitting the Lindent output anyway.
>
> >
> > If you could sent out an unmangled patch (even as attachment or on
> > LSI's ftp side) I'd like to take another, closer look.
>
> I am sending this from a Linux box. Hopefully, this will comeout clean.
> Sorry for mangled patches.
It's still wrapped, unfortunately. Let's retry as an attachment.
Anyway, I think we can put the patch in now. I have a few more really
small things that I'd like to address, I will submit patches as soon
as I have a codebase that I can create patches against.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-06 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 0:34 FW: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH scsi-misc 2/2] megaraid_sas: LSI Logic MegaR AID SAS RA ID D river] Bagalkote, Sreenivas
2005-09-06 13:30 ` 'hch@lst.de' [this message]
2005-09-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-01 1:00 Bagalkote, Sreenivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050906133033.GA30721@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@Dell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=knsyam@lsil.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sreenib@lsil.com \
--cc=sumantp@COS1.co.lsil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox