From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932467AbVIFNa4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:30:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932469AbVIFNa4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:30:56 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:19591 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932467AbVIFNaz (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:30:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:30:33 +0200 From: "'hch@lst.de'" To: "Bagalkote, Sreenivas" Cc: "'hch@lst.de'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" , "'James Bottomley'" , Andrew Morton , "'Matt_Domsch@Dell.com'" , "Patro, Sumant" , "Kolli, Neela Syam" Subject: Re: FW: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH scsi-misc 2/2] megaraid_sas: LSI Logic MegaR AID SAS RA ID D river] Message-ID: <20050906133033.GA30721@lst.de> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57060CD126@exa-atlanta> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57060CD126@exa-atlanta> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:34:07PM -0400, Bagalkote, Sreenivas wrote: > > - the ->queuecommand cleanup patch I sent you a awhile ago doesn't > > seem to be applied > > I seem to have missed it. I will submit the patch after inclusion ok, this is really just a small cleanup anyway. > > - there's quite a lot of slightly odd formating, it would be nice > > if you could run the code through scripts/Lindent. > > I ran Lindent. It looks worse :( I am submitting the Lindent output anyway. > > > > > If you could sent out an unmangled patch (even as attachment or on > > LSI's ftp side) I'd like to take another, closer look. > > I am sending this from a Linux box. Hopefully, this will comeout clean. > Sorry for mangled patches. It's still wrapped, unfortunately. Let's retry as an attachment. Anyway, I think we can put the patch in now. I have a few more really small things that I'd like to address, I will submit patches as soon as I have a codebase that I can create patches against.