From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Dave Miller <davem@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Serial maintainership
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:25:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050908172537.F5661@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1126197523.19834.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:38:43PM +0100
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-09-08 at 16:52 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > I notice DaveM's taken over serial maintainership. Please arrange for
> > serial patches to be sent to davem in future, thanks. (All ARM serial
> > drivers are broken as of Tuesday.)
> >
> > I might take a different view if I at least had a curtious CC: of the
> > patch, which I had already asked akpm to reject.
> >
> > Thanks. That's another subsystem I don't have to care about anymore.
>
> Please remember to send Linus a patch updating MAINTAINERS if so.
Well, it appears that we're fast approaching meltdown in kernel
land - patches are being applied despite maintainers objection,
maintainers are not being copied with changes in their area, etc.
I might mind less with the occasional slip up if it was occasional,
but it doesn't appear to be anymore - maybe not from my perspective.
This morning Andi Kleen stated:
"normally he (akpm) asks you before finally sending them off -
then you can complain again"
I don't appear to be asked by akpm - patches from -mm are sent
to Linus CC'd me, and that occurs during the night. Come the
morning, they're in Linus tree so unless one is awake reading
email 24 hours a day, it's impossible to "complain again".
Is there a concerted effort to maintainers? It certainly seems
so from my perspective.
---
Paranoia, n.
1. A psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution
with or without grandeur, often strenuously defended with apparent
logic and reason.
2. Extreme, irrational distrust of others.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-08 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 15:52 Serial maintainership Russell King
2005-09-08 16:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-08 16:25 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-09-08 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 20:22 ` Russell King
2005-09-08 20:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:42 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 21:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 21:31 ` Russell King
2005-09-08 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:31 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050908172537.F5661@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox