From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Serial maintainership
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 22:31:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050908223152.E19542@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0509081418310.3039@g5.osdl.org>; from torvalds@osdl.org on Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:22:37PM -0700
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:22:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Ok, I'll revert the patch and fix the sunsab.c driver as
> > Russell indicated. So much for type checking...
>
> Actually, I think there's a simpler fix. Instead of reverting, how about
> something like this?
>
> (You might even remove the #ifdef inside the function by then, since "ch"
> being a constant zero will make 90% of it go away anyway).
>
> rmk? Davem?
Ok, I'll settle for this.
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -401,6 +401,9 @@ uart_handle_sysrq_char(struct uart_port
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> +#ifndef SUPPORT_SYSRQ
> +#define uart_handle_sysrq_char(port,ch,regs) uart_handle_sysrq_char(port, 0, NULL)
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * We do the SysRQ and SAK checking like this...
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-08 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 15:52 Serial maintainership Russell King
2005-09-08 16:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-09-08 16:25 ` Russell King
2005-09-08 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 20:22 ` Russell King
2005-09-08 20:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:42 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 21:26 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-08 21:31 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-09-08 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-08 20:31 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050908223152.E19542@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox