public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marko Kohtala <marko.kohtala@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 02:43:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050909024336.01763521.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1q1i1lav2vl7k0lpposq0uj4uobsptnor@4ax.com>

Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 05:30:42 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm2/
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> After this error:
> 
>   CC      drivers/parport/parport_pc.o
> drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:2511: error: via_686a_data causes a section type conflict
> drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:2520: error: via_8231_data causes a section type conflict
> drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:2705: error: parport_pc_superio_info causes a section type conflict
> drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:2782: error: cards causes a section type conflict
> make[2]: *** [drivers/parport/parport_pc.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [drivers/parport] Error 2
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2

Yes, gcc 4.x doesn't like the consts for some reason.


diff -puN drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~a drivers/parport/parport_pc.c
--- devel/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c~a	2005-09-09 02:32:49.000000000 -0700
+++ devel-akpm/drivers/parport/parport_pc.c	2005-09-09 02:33:35.000000000 -0700
@@ -2509,7 +2509,7 @@ static int __devinit sio_ite_8872_probe 
 static int __devinitdata parport_init_mode = 0;
 
 /* Data for two known VIA chips */
-static const struct parport_pc_via_data via_686a_data __devinitdata = {
+static struct parport_pc_via_data via_686a_data __devinitdata = {
 	0x51,
 	0x50,
 	0x85,
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static const struct parport_pc_via_data 
 	0xF0,
 	0xE6
 };
-static const struct parport_pc_via_data via_8231_data __devinitdata = {
+static struct parport_pc_via_data via_8231_data __devinitdata = {
 	0x45,
 	0x44,
 	0x50,
@@ -2699,7 +2699,7 @@ enum parport_pc_sio_types {
 };
 
 /* each element directly indexed from enum list, above */
-static const struct parport_pc_superio {
+static struct parport_pc_superio {
 	int (*probe) (struct pci_dev *pdev, int autoirq, int autodma,
 		      const struct parport_pc_via_data *via);
 	const struct parport_pc_via_data *via;
@@ -2763,7 +2763,7 @@ enum parport_pc_pci_cards {
 
 /* each element directly indexed from enum list, above 
  * (but offset by last_sio) */
-static const struct parport_pc_pci {
+static struct parport_pc_pci {
 	int numports;
 	struct { /* BAR (base address registers) numbers in the config
                     space header */
_



> Warning! Found recursive dependency: HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP CRYPTO CRYPTO_ANUBIS
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP CRYPTO CRYPTO_MD4
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP CRYPTO CRYPTO_MD5
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP CRYPTO CRYPTO_AES_X86_64
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HERMES TMD_HERMES
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO HOSTAP HOSTAP_PCI
> Warning! Found recursive dependency: NET_RADIO HOSTAP IEEE80211 NET_RADIO WAVELAN

Yup, Jeff knows about that..

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-09  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-08 12:30 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 13:12 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Benoit Boissinot
2005-09-08 13:48 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-08 14:30 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-09  0:39   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-09 10:41     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09 10:46       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-08 15:11 ` 2.6.13-mm2 high memory support borken? Michal Piotrowski
2005-09-09  9:29   ` Andrew Morton
2005-09-08 17:20 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-08 19:39   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10  7:02     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Michael Thonke
2005-09-09  1:47 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-09  9:43   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-09-09 13:45     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Grant Coady
2005-09-10  6:33       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Marko Kohtala
2005-09-09  2:52 ` 2.6.13-mm2 - drivers/char/speakup/speakup doesn't compile (+warnings from other things) Damir Perisa
2005-09-09 12:18   ` Alan Cox
2005-09-09 20:57 ` 2.6.13-mm2 (general protection fault) Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 11:45 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 12:42   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 13:46     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Manuel Lauss
2005-09-10 20:21       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 21:26       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Antonino A. Daplas
2005-09-10 18:43 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dominik Karall
2005-09-10 22:12   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-10 23:46 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-10 23:56   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11  0:07     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11  0:49       ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  0:58         ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  1:03           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11  1:22             ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11  1:25               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 17:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 19:36   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 20:03     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-12 19:19       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-11 20:08     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-12 10:04       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:06       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-12 10:09         ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-18 21:49           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-19  3:07             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Hugh Dickins
2005-09-19 15:56               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-23 16:52             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:05               ` 2.6.13-mm2 Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 20:23                 ` [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.13-mm2 David Brownell
2005-09-28 20:37                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 20:56                     ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:34                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:04                         ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 22:32                           ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-29  0:09                             ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 15:36                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-29 16:31                                 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29 19:39                                 ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-30 16:33                               ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-30 17:48                                 ` David Brownell
2005-09-29  2:54                             ` Alan Stern
2005-09-28 20:45                   ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 21:07                     ` David Brownell
2005-09-28 21:47                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-09-28 22:07                       ` Daniel Ritz
2005-09-28 21:10                     ` Alan Stern
2005-09-29 15:22                 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Linus Torvalds
2005-09-12  3:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  5:01   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12  6:09     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  7:16       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 18:06     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12 18:19       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Dave Hansen
2005-09-12 18:51       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andi Kleen
2005-09-12 22:46         ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-13  0:08           ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-13  4:00             ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
2005-09-12  3:10 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Martin J. Bligh
     [not found] <4KtRD-7Nt-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-08 23:23 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Ronny V. Vindenes
2005-09-08 23:34   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-09  0:26     ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
2005-09-09  0:55       ` 2.6.13-mm2 Roland McGrath
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-17  0:36 2.6.13-mm2 Chuck Ebbert
2005-09-17  4:17 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar
2005-09-17  4:30   ` 2.6.13-mm2 Parag Warudkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050909024336.01763521.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marko.kohtala@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox