From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932537AbVIIIkR (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:40:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932541AbVIIIkR (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:40:17 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:17291 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932537AbVIIIkQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 04:40:16 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [discuss] [PATCH] x86-64 CFI annotation fixes and additions Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:40:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: "Jan Beulich" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <43207A6302000078000244F4@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <43207A6302000078000244F4@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509091040.11405.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 September 2005 17:52, Jan Beulich wrote: > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get > line wrapped.) > > Being the foundation for reliable stack unwinding, this fixes CFI > unwind > annotations in many low-level x86_64 routines, plus a config option > (available to all architectures, and also present in the previously > sent > patch adding such annotations to i386 code) to enable them separatly > rather than only along with adding full debug information. Thanks. The UNWIND_INFO part has still some problems - in particular it is lying on all other architectures which don't check it yet. I made it dependent on X86_64 right now. -Andi P.S.: Can you perhaps add a From: Jan B ... line to the attachments? Otherwise i need to always edit them by hand to get the authorship right.